| Controversial but, if no Burns, I'd start Jackson over Hutchinson 13:23 - Nov 11 with 692 views | pointofblue |
Hutchinson brings more to us as an impact player than Jackson. He almost changed the game in our favour at Rotherham - would have done if we could have cleared the ball properly at the death - and did the same against Blackburn when Dolan was having a real affect on the game for Rovers. Whereas he had less of a role at Birmingham and everything felt forced to him against Plymouth, to his and our detriment.
If Burns is not available then whoever is picked on the right today will be moved away from their 'preferred' role. With that being the case, I'd prefer it to be Jackson. |  |
| |  |
| Controversial but, if no Burns, I'd start Jackson over Hutchinson on 13:26 - Nov 11 with 669 views | Mullet |
It's not controversial at all. If people can't see what different roles/attributes Jackson and Omari bring to a game that'd be baffling. |  |
| |
| Controversial but, if no Burns, I'd start Jackson over Hutchinson on 07:13 - Nov 12 with 543 views | norfsufblue |
He was brilliant yesterday apart from one glaring deficiency, the calmness required inside the six yard box.... he'll be getting tuition on this ver the next fortnight hopefully. |  | | |
| Controversial but, if no Burns, I'd start Jackson over Hutchinson on 07:53 - Nov 12 with 465 views | cressi |
| Controversial but, if no Burns, I'd start Jackson over Hutchinson on 07:13 - Nov 12 by norfsufblue |
He was brilliant yesterday apart from one glaring deficiency, the calmness required inside the six yard box.... he'll be getting tuition on this ver the next fortnight hopefully. |
No way Hutchinson will get better Jackson has had 4 years here still can't pick a pass one I would definitely look to replace with better in January don't knock his work ethics just lack of ability. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
