| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) 20:25 - Nov 20 with 1663 views | GeoffSentence |
[Post edited 20 Nov 2023 20:25]
|  |
| |  |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:28 - Nov 20 with 1620 views | Herbivore |
That's an absolute shocker for me. That said, thought Maguire was lucky earlier in the half so arguably it's evened itself out. |  |
| |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:29 - Nov 20 with 1607 views | iamatractorboy |
I can't understand that one. Surely the attacker ran into the hand, rather than the hand/arm being thrust into him. Mad. |  | | |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:30 - Nov 20 with 1597 views | strikalite |
The crowd helped him bottle it.. |  | | |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:30 - Nov 20 with 1577 views | Chondzoresk |
Woeful decision. Utter disgrace. |  | | |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:32 - Nov 20 with 1544 views | blueislander |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:28 - Nov 20 by Herbivore |
That's an absolute shocker for me. That said, thought Maguire was lucky earlier in the half so arguably it's evened itself out. |
If they had gone to VAR for Maguire’s I could understand it, but that was ridiculous. | | | |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:32 - Nov 20 with 1543 views | Scuzzer |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:29 - Nov 20 by iamatractorboy |
I can't understand that one. Surely the attacker ran into the hand, rather than the hand/arm being thrust into him. Mad. |
Absolutely right.
Nonsense decision. |  |
| |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:32 - Nov 20 with 1541 views | GeoffSentence |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:28 - Nov 20 by Herbivore |
That's an absolute shocker for me. That said, thought Maguire was lucky earlier in the half so arguably it's evened itself out. |
yes, on both counts. But it does mean the ref has cocked up twice. | |
| |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:33 - Nov 20 with 1535 views | _clive_baker_ |
Has a ref ever consulted the screen and not given a penalty? Seems a little pointless if they aren’t going to look at what’s being presented. There’s no chance that’s a penalty |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:34 - Nov 20 with 1514 views | Herbivore |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:32 - Nov 20 by GeoffSentence |
yes, on both counts. But it does mean the ref has cocked up twice. |
Two wrongs making a right maybe? | |
| |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:40 - Nov 20 with 1457 views | ibbleobble |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:33 - Nov 20 by _clive_baker_ |
Has a ref ever consulted the screen and not given a penalty? Seems a little pointless if they aren’t going to look at what’s being presented. There’s no chance that’s a penalty |
Baffling. Clearly the momentum of the ball is going beyond the striker and Lewis has turned with to head it on. He’s got his back to the striker, his eyes on the ball and his finger tips have flicked the face. At worst it’s a facial and head massage tomorrow morning, not a pen.
Time for VAR to go. It’s become painfully pathetic now. | | | |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:40 - Nov 20 with 1455 views | strikalite |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:33 - Nov 20 by _clive_baker_ |
Has a ref ever consulted the screen and not given a penalty? Seems a little pointless if they aren’t going to look at what’s being presented. There’s no chance that’s a penalty |
This was his chance to re-address that and come out of it with respect..
But he blew it. | | | |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:45 - Nov 20 with 1408 views | GeoffSentence |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:34 - Nov 20 by Herbivore |
Two wrongs making a right maybe? |
Might have been on his mind, but the upshot is he has made two mistakes now instead of one. | |
| |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 21:12 - Nov 20 with 1304 views | Illinoisblue |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:33 - Nov 20 by _clive_baker_ |
Has a ref ever consulted the screen and not given a penalty? Seems a little pointless if they aren’t going to look at what’s being presented. There’s no chance that’s a penalty |
It is ridiculous. Every commentator now always says “oh we know what this means..” whenever a ref goes to the screen. Surely the on-field ref should be bold and brave enough to go with their own decision or just say NO to the VAR. |  |
| |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 22:21 - Nov 20 with 1182 views | ronnyd |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 20:40 - Nov 20 by ibbleobble |
Baffling. Clearly the momentum of the ball is going beyond the striker and Lewis has turned with to head it on. He’s got his back to the striker, his eyes on the ball and his finger tips have flicked the face. At worst it’s a facial and head massage tomorrow morning, not a pen.
Time for VAR to go. It’s become painfully pathetic now. |
On the subject of VAR, how long did it take for them to decide that Grealish was offside for his 'goal'? Three minutes when you could see in three seconds, or even less. Proof that not all the sh!t refs are in the EFL. | | | |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 06:11 - Nov 21 with 1059 views | ibbleobble |
| File that one under 'Soft Penalties' (n/t) on 22:21 - Nov 20 by ronnyd |
On the subject of VAR, how long did it take for them to decide that Grealish was offside for his 'goal'? Three minutes when you could see in three seconds, or even less. Proof that not all the sh!t refs are in the EFL. |
I thought Ukraine should have had a pen in injury time too which didn’t even get a VAR review. Don’t think there was even a yellow brandished - it was either a pen or a dive; much more in favour of a foul. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
