| Phillips 15:38 - Aug 18 with 1649 views | Wicksy |
Assume he can't play against City? |  |
| |  |
| Phillips on 15:40 - Aug 18 with 1632 views | Wickets |
That's right |  | | |
| Phillips on 16:03 - Aug 18 with 1496 views | RIPbobby |
The only time I can remember a player playing against his true owners was Sixto against inter. Think it is generally stopped in mist competitions to stop conflict of interest. |  | | |
| Phillips on 18:06 - Aug 18 with 1212 views | MK1 |
It use to be up to the players owners. If Man City don't object, then he could play. Like I say, It use to be that way, but may well have changed. |  |
| |
| Phillips on 18:33 - Aug 18 with 1097 views | Wallingford_Boy |
He wouldn’t have anyway, needs to get match fit, hardly played for 18 months! |  |
| |
| Phillips on 18:35 - Aug 18 with 1073 views | SheffordBlue |
| Phillips on 18:33 - Aug 18 by Wallingford_Boy |
He wouldn’t have anyway, needs to get match fit, hardly played for 18 months! |
He's done a full preseason with City and got plenty of minutes during that. |  |
| |
| Phillips on 18:36 - Aug 18 with 1059 views | tonybied |
| Phillips on 18:33 - Aug 18 by Wallingford_Boy |
He wouldn’t have anyway, needs to get match fit, hardly played for 18 months! |
...apart from pretty much all of city's pre-season games! |  | | |
| Phillips on 18:39 - Aug 18 with 1030 views | Radlett_blue |
| Phillips on 18:06 - Aug 18 by MK1 |
It use to be up to the players owners. If Man City don't object, then he could play. Like I say, It use to be that way, but may well have changed. |
No, it is now a firm rule, partly to stop some of the "gentlemen's agreements" that operated in the past. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
