| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. 20:48 - Nov 30 with 1629 views | ITFC_Forever |
Spent the whole game falling over and rolling around like he’s been shot, or mis-controlling it off the side of the pitch.
And through one of those, he cons the referee and VAR to decide the match. [Post edited 30 Nov 2024 21:05]
|  |
| |  |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 20:58 - Nov 30 with 1547 views | BarcaBlue |
I've seen him a few times this season and he is a dreadful player. Complete lack or quality, has a real poor touch, enjoys a dive and outrageous eyebrows. |  | | |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 21:02 - Nov 30 with 1516 views | heavyweight |
He should've been booked for his haircut alone. |  | | |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 21:05 - Nov 30 with 1497 views | BarcaBlue |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 21:02 - Nov 30 by heavyweight |
He should've been booked for his haircut alone. |
Yep, like a cartoon creation of Grealish from that badly drawn footballers site. | | | |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 21:22 - Nov 30 with 1399 views | Mullet |
The free kick where he lost the ball, looked at the ref, as we played on, threw himself down and started clutching his shin baffled me. Especially as the ref seemed to go along with it and award the free kick once it was demanded.
Very baffling and inconsistent all game with those decisions. |  |
| |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 09:55 - Dec 1 with 951 views | Jimmy86 |
He's just a Temu Jack Grealish... Horrible little cheat | | | |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 11:09 - Dec 1 with 854 views | BlueOura |
He didn't con anybody for the penalty, it was a foul. |  | | |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 12:29 - Dec 1 with 765 views | Wickets |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 11:09 - Dec 1 by BlueOura |
He didn't con anybody for the penalty, it was a foul. |
It was a slight touch on the side of his boot , its a physical contact sport , on first view I thought it was a foul too but after watching it several times I'm not so sure . The shreik and throwing himself to the floor was of course a con . |  | | |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 13:06 - Dec 1 with 718 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 12:29 - Dec 1 by Wickets |
It was a slight touch on the side of his boot , its a physical contact sport , on first view I thought it was a foul too but after watching it several times I'm not so sure . The shreik and throwing himself to the floor was of course a con . |
Having seen it a few more times, and in the cold light of day, I can see why it was given.
But if that’s a penalty, how the hell aren’t the ones on Clarke (Everton) and Chaplin (Leicester)? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 13:07 - Dec 1 with 706 views | FoghornGleghorn |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 13:06 - Dec 1 by ITFC_Forever |
Having seen it a few more times, and in the cold light of day, I can see why it was given.
But if that’s a penalty, how the hell aren’t the ones on Clarke (Everton) and Chaplin (Leicester)? |
Certainly isn't evening itself out yet, is it? | | | |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 13:09 - Dec 1 with 700 views | Mullet |
| Their no. 20, Jota was awful. on 13:06 - Dec 1 by ITFC_Forever |
Having seen it a few more times, and in the cold light of day, I can see why it was given.
But if that’s a penalty, how the hell aren’t the ones on Clarke (Everton) and Chaplin (Leicester)? |
That’s the issue isn’t it? The consistency not the individual decisions in isolation | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
