| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 14:17 - Jul 11 with 524 views | bsw72 |
A media play rather than any form of action being undertaken. |  | |  |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 12:16 - Jul 12 with 371 views | DJR |
Sharon Graham (the Unite General Secretary) has been pretty hostile to Labour since she was elected, so this is not unexpected. |  | | |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 13:02 - Jul 12 with 336 views | Leaky |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 12:16 - Jul 12 by DJR |
Sharon Graham (the Unite General Secretary) has been pretty hostile to Labour since she was elected, so this is not unexpected. |
Seems nearly everyone is hostile to Labour, are they all wrong |  | | |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 13:59 - Jul 12 with 252 views | chicoazul |
This can’t be correct, all I ever hear from the Tories in here is how Labour are in the pocket of the unions. |  |
| |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 15:52 - Jul 12 with 194 views | jayessess |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 12:16 - Jul 12 by DJR |
Sharon Graham (the Unite General Secretary) has been pretty hostile to Labour since she was elected, so this is not unexpected. |
Graham's whole thing is that Unite should just be hyper-focused on winning disputes and use any/all leverage they've got to do that.
That's what this is really. Their members are in dispute with a Labour-run council and suspending Rayner is a cheap way of exerting a bit of leverage on someone with some ability to influence proceedings.
(Probably also makes them unlikely to just pull all political funds from Labour) [Post edited 12 Jul 15:56]
|  |
| |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 17:38 - Jul 12 with 121 views | DJR |
| Unite questioning its relationship with Labour! on 15:52 - Jul 12 by jayessess |
Graham's whole thing is that Unite should just be hyper-focused on winning disputes and use any/all leverage they've got to do that.
That's what this is really. Their members are in dispute with a Labour-run council and suspending Rayner is a cheap way of exerting a bit of leverage on someone with some ability to influence proceedings.
(Probably also makes them unlikely to just pull all political funds from Labour) [Post edited 12 Jul 15:56]
|
Interestingly, although from the left, she was not the left's preferred candidate to succeed Len McCluskey. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
