| This Encisco deal... 10:14 - Aug 21 with 1050 views | ElderGrizzly |
I'm maybe late to this, but how can a company own a player, rather than a football club?
Who owns the registration etc? Or is he effectively loaned each time, so the registration moves each time on a temporary basis?
Is this a way to avoid PSR? What's to stop the Saudi fund buying 100 players as a company and then sending them to the highest bidder?
Buying players as a company and then sending them to a new owner each time sounds like a place we don't want football to be going? |  | | |  |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:16 - Aug 21 with 1015 views | WD19 |
I thought this kind of thing was banned post the Tevez/Mascherano nonsense. |  | | |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:16 - Aug 21 with 1014 views | Kieran_Knows |
It’ll be Strasbourg that owns him, then they’ll ‘sell’ him to Chelsea next year for a similar fee.
I genuinely can’t believe that sort of thing is allowed to happen, it’s clear what is going on. |  |
| |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:17 - Aug 21 with 993 views | Blue_Moses |
It's been happening for years, Tevez was owned by a company when he went to West Ham |  | | |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:18 - Aug 21 with 977 views | Radlett_blue |
I thought "3rd party ownership" had been barred a long time ago, going back to Kia Joorabchian & the Tevez-Mascherano affair.? However, as we all know, UEFA's rules are made to be broken, even by themselves. |  |
| |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:21 - Aug 21 with 919 views | PioneerBlue |
There are quite a few directions we probably don’t want to be going but the rat is out of the bag on many!
Players on strike to force moves
Player agents moving clients around like chess pieces to maximise revenue not player performance
Clubs holding players until the last hours of a window rather than enabling loans to maximise performance by early summer involvements in new clubs preseason
Massive clubs hoarding players and selling a few each year to maximise PSR
Blar Blar Blar | |
| |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:25 - Aug 21 with 877 views | Tangledupin_Blue |
Didn't Luciano Civelli have some sort of 'ownership' arrangement? |  |
| |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:27 - Aug 21 with 839 views | DanTheMan |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:17 - Aug 21 by Blue_Moses |
It's been happening for years, Tevez was owned by a company when he went to West Ham |
But it was banned by FIFA a decade ago. |  |
| |
| This Encisco deal... on 12:25 - Aug 21 with 483 views | stonojnr |
| This Encisco deal... on 10:27 - Aug 21 by DanTheMan |
But it was banned by FIFA a decade ago. |
which presumably must mean theres more to it than appears obvious at a glance.
a bit like for FFP rules you werent supposed to be able to sell your stadium to one of your other companies for unbelieavale amounts and then claim it as a profit on the books to buy players with. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| This Encisco deal... on 12:30 - Aug 21 with 438 views | Devereuxxx |
Crystal Palace not allowed to compete in the Europa League but this is somehow fine. Games gone. |  | | |
| This Encisco deal... on 12:33 - Aug 21 with 419 views | bluelady |
| This Encisco deal... on 12:30 - Aug 21 by Devereuxxx |
Crystal Palace not allowed to compete in the Europa League but this is somehow fine. Games gone. |
exactly.. .there are rules but they appear to only apply to some! The more money you have as a club the less you are scrutinised so it appears... Corrupt or what! |  | | |
| This Encisco deal... on 13:07 - Aug 21 with 272 views | PrideOfTheEast |
Happened to some extent for years though. Watford and Udinese being an example of something that I’ve never seen as “fair”. | | | |
| This Encisco deal... on 13:21 - Aug 21 with 214 views | ElderGrizzly |
| This Encisco deal... on 13:07 - Aug 21 by PrideOfTheEast |
Happened to some extent for years though. Watford and Udinese being an example of something that I’ve never seen as “fair”. |
I get that example, but at least there it appeared one club was actually buying them even if we knew it was all a 'fix'
The way I read the article, was it was a commercial company buying Encisco not a single club? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
