| Fixture backlog and the international break 14:24 - Feb 13 with 661 views | pedrail |
My understanding (which may be wrong) is that teams can play matches during the international break if both teams agree and if the League agree. If the backlog gets bad, is this something we should consider? We would lose O'Shea, Núñez, Egeli, possibly Hirst and Burns - anyone else? But it may be a better option than cramming games into an already tight schedule. |  | | |  |
| Fixture backlog and the international break on 14:26 - Feb 13 with 635 views | hype313 |
That's 4 guaranteed starters we would lose. No chance. |  |
| |
| Fixture backlog and the international break on 14:35 - Feb 13 with 563 views | pedrail |
| Fixture backlog and the international break on 14:26 - Feb 13 by hype313 |
That's 4 guaranteed starters we would lose. No chance. |
But with four excellent back-ups | | | |
| Fixture backlog and the international break on 14:45 - Feb 13 with 527 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Fixture backlog and the international break on 14:35 - Feb 13 by pedrail |
But with four excellent back-ups |
Who would normally be in the bench. |  |
| |
| Fixture backlog and the international break on 15:12 - Feb 13 with 442 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Fixture backlog and the international break on 14:26 - Feb 13 by hype313 |
That's 4 guaranteed starters we would lose. No chance. |
Whilst I agree and it won't happen, presumably the opposition would miss regular starters as well. On top of that we are likely to rest regular starters if we end up playing 3 or more games in a week or just over.
I agree it won't happen and I suspect the league wouldn't agree to it either (not wanting the clash with international football) but I get the OP's logic. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
