| Should Kluivert have seen Red? 15:21 - Nov 8 with 917 views | King_of_Portman_Rd | Never like to beg for opponents to be sent off, but that late challenge on Palacios I thought should have had VAR having a look… Late, studs onto the ankles after the ball had gone. Seen refs brandish a red for similar this season, surprised commentators didn’t make more of it or that VAR didn’t seem to be interested either |  | | |  |
| Should Kluivert have seen Red? on 15:23 - Nov 8 | Nthsuffolkblue | Indeed. For me it was a clear yellow card that could have been a red. If VAR are reviewing a possible red for last man when it clearly isn't one then it should have reviewed that one too. |  |
|  |
| Should Kluivert have seen Red? on 15:32 - Nov 8 | redrickstuhaart | Yes. Though when I said it I got multiple downvotes... |  |
|  |
| Should Kluivert have seen Red? on 15:35 - Nov 8 | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Should Kluivert have seen Red? on 15:32 - Nov 8 by redrickstuhaart | Yes. Though when I said it I got multiple downvotes... |
I didn't downvote you because my position is as stated in this OP. It was worth VAR pointing out to the referee if that is how VAR is working. It was a yellow not a red. I think the downvotes for yours were for stating it was a clear red rather than asking the question. It really wasn't a red. |  |
|  |
| Should Kluivert have seen Red? on 16:01 - Nov 8 | Nutkins_Return | Seen them given against us but I thought that was a rotten decision so it's a no for me. I think there has to be more intent and convinced. It was a foul and a yellow for me but ref missed it. |  |
|  |
| Should Kluivert have seen Red? on 18:42 - Nov 8 | mellowblue | I was in line with it, thought it was a bit naughty, raking his ankle but did not look reckless or out of control, looked a yellow to me. Painful one. |  | |  |
| |