Please log in to use all the site's facilities
|Kenlock v Knudsen...|
at 11:37 16 Apr 2017
The problem I have with this is that we spent £300k on Knudsen, which may be a relatively small amount, but it happens to be the third highest transfer fee we have paid out in 5 years.
I dont think anyone can really argue that he didnt make a particularly great impression last season and that, given his age, he was perhaps one for the future who needed time to settle.
But at the same time, we had a player in our own academy who, to my admittedly untrained eye, looked to have more potential in his fleeting appearances than Knudsen did in the 40+ starts he was afforded.
What we needed last year was a stop gap- a player who could come in immediately and perform at a strong level for two years whilst our own development player was slowly fed into the team. Rather than another player, at a reasonable fee, who also needed developing at the same time, at the detriment of the first team.
It strikes me that we should have just stuck with Parr for 2 seasons, as a relatively cheap but capable left back.
|Forum Votes: ||191|
|Comment Votes: ||81|
|Prediction League: ||0|