| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 07:29 - Oct 14 with 5038 views | Pendejo |
With regards to the title of the article - they paid a market rate.
With regards to right decision for Derby - well that's something for the hindsight review at end of the season. Too early to tell.
Right decision for Waghorn - in terms of pension pot and earnings, of course it was the right decision. |  |
|  |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 08:12 - Oct 14 with 4906 views | Ftnfwest |
2 in 4 starts? I suppose they need to play him a bit more to get their money’s worth |  | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 08:23 - Oct 14 with 4869 views | christiand |
Depends on Waghorn’s personal ambitions. If he was just about getting a bumper pay day and securing the long term future of his family then yes, he’s made the right decision. |  |
| |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 09:02 - Oct 14 with 4765 views | Townly |
Just because Waghorn is not the pivotal player at Derby the way he was at Ipswich doesn't indicate to me that they made a mistake.
He is in the match day squad after all and we are always led to assume that it's a squad game nowadays.
It more emphasises the relative strengths of the two squads, a factor which will become more significant when injuries take their toll during the hard Championship campaign.
He remains a very useful player to bring on as a substitute and didn't he lay on their equaliser against Norwich after all?
The article is making something out of nothing, imo, and the £5m fee is hardly over the top these days. It will become peanuts should Waggy score and lay on a few and Derby go up this season. | | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 09:26 - Oct 14 with 4684 views | Popeye |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 07:29 - Oct 14 by Pendejo |
With regards to the title of the article - they paid a market rate.
With regards to right decision for Derby - well that's something for the hindsight review at end of the season. Too early to tell.
Right decision for Waghorn - in terms of pension pot and earnings, of course it was the right decision. |
Right decision for him and club financially but for him personally probably not the wisest move. Marriott not consistent and nugent 33 yrs old so neither will play every game but in January will lampard sign someone else and try and offload Waghorn. I’m assuming it was franks decision to sign him and not a conifer decision but it seems strange considering the number of strikers they already have | | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 10:36 - Oct 14 with 4510 views | Wickets |
Bit to expensive to bring him back on loan in January i suppose! |  | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:20 - Oct 14 with 4274 views | backwiththeboysagain |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 10:36 - Oct 14 by Wickets |
Bit to expensive to bring him back on loan in January i suppose! |
Very much doubt he’d want to return here, was off as soon as it was apparent there was interest from other teams. Can’t even recall him saying much about us after he’d left either. |  | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:25 - Oct 14 with 4252 views | J2BLUE |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:20 - Oct 14 by backwiththeboysagain |
Very much doubt he’d want to return here, was off as soon as it was apparent there was interest from other teams. Can’t even recall him saying much about us after he’d left either. |
He wanted to go to Derby. Who can blame him? More money, more chance of promotion and he gets to play for a legend of the game. We love Town but for a random player it's a no brainer. He probably feels he paid us back with the fee we got for him. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:57 - Oct 14 with 4165 views | bournemouthblue |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:25 - Oct 14 by J2BLUE |
He wanted to go to Derby. Who can blame him? More money, more chance of promotion and he gets to play for a legend of the game. We love Town but for a random player it's a no brainer. He probably feels he paid us back with the fee we got for him. |
Indeed an absolute no brainer
They are a bigger club currently with better resources. He previously played for Leicester up that way so may still have property in the area? |  |
| |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 16:04 - Oct 14 with 3978 views | Wickets |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:25 - Oct 14 by J2BLUE |
He wanted to go to Derby. Who can blame him? More money, more chance of promotion and he gets to play for a legend of the game. We love Town but for a random player it's a no brainer. He probably feels he paid us back with the fee we got for him. |
TBH There is not many players who turn down moves that mean they are going to increase their salaries does not mean he had anything against Town. If the money was right he would return but it we all know it would not be. My thoughts are that ME has decided that big wages, such as he paid McGoldrick and more than likely Waghorn is now on are not for us. Reading between the lines Bart has likely had a big increase and that is not going well as yet! | | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 16:37 - Oct 14 with 3911 views | jas0999 |
If Waghorns ambitions are money related then it was clearly the right move for him. It would seem he wanted to go, so you’d assume it was the financial draw as realistically, if they do get promoted he won’t start too many in the PL.
As for Derby, £5 M for a championship proven striker is market rate. Something Evans really needs to consider. They got a good deal. As did we. Derbys squad looks good in comparison to ours. | | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 17:20 - Oct 14 with 3846 views | Wickets |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 16:37 - Oct 14 by jas0999 |
If Waghorns ambitions are money related then it was clearly the right move for him. It would seem he wanted to go, so you’d assume it was the financial draw as realistically, if they do get promoted he won’t start too many in the PL.
As for Derby, £5 M for a championship proven striker is market rate. Something Evans really needs to consider. They got a good deal. As did we. Derbys squad looks good in comparison to ours. |
Very true and i suppose Derbys budget looks good compared to ours, on the other side our owner quite possible got a bit Peed off paying about 35 grand a week on McGoldrick, Huw's and our other midfielders while they were injured. | | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 00:08 - Oct 15 with 3488 views | Jonnosdreadlocks |
would rather have a fit David McGoldrick back but neither will happen. |  |
| |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 12:10 - Oct 15 with 3216 views | The_Last_Baron |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 08:23 - Oct 14 by christiand |
Depends on Waghorn’s personal ambitions. If he was just about getting a bumper pay day and securing the long term future of his family then yes, he’s made the right decision. |
There's more to life than money. He was earning a handsome wage playing for Ipswich, many times more than the average man earns.
He is capable of working after playing football, therefore his ability to earn money won't end when he is 35 or whatever age he finishes playing professional football.
He could have went on to play 200+ games for Town and become a club great. He'll end his career as a journeyman footballer and will be largely forgotten within a few years. Just like many before him. |  |
| |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 12:18 - Oct 15 with 3183 views | No9 |
Wasn't he happy at PR until PH arrived?
Which begs the question - was the decision enforced? | | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:17 - Oct 15 with 3077 views | J2BLUE |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 12:10 - Oct 15 by The_Last_Baron |
There's more to life than money. He was earning a handsome wage playing for Ipswich, many times more than the average man earns.
He is capable of working after playing football, therefore his ability to earn money won't end when he is 35 or whatever age he finishes playing professional football.
He could have went on to play 200+ games for Town and become a club great. He'll end his career as a journeyman footballer and will be largely forgotten within a few years. Just like many before him. |
I don't understand this attitude. The general consensus is that Derby are the better bet for both finances and ambition yet people still seem a bit offended. Waghorn has a real chance to experience a promotion and possibly some Premier League game time. He's only won two minor trophies in Scotland. I'm sure he'd rather have the memory of a promotion than be a Town legend as harsh as that may be to hear.
People are being needlessly critical IMO | |
| |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 14:30 - Oct 15 with 3010 views | soclopath |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:20 - Oct 14 by backwiththeboysagain |
Very much doubt he’d want to return here, was off as soon as it was apparent there was interest from other teams. Can’t even recall him saying much about us after he’d left either. |
I think tha if ITFC had offered him the same terms as Derby or Boro, he wold still be with us,however this allowed the new manager to bring in his chosen players. | | | |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 18:42 - Oct 15 with 2891 views | Wickets |
| Did Waghorn or Derby make the right decision? on 13:17 - Oct 15 by J2BLUE |
I don't understand this attitude. The general consensus is that Derby are the better bet for both finances and ambition yet people still seem a bit offended. Waghorn has a real chance to experience a promotion and possibly some Premier League game time. He's only won two minor trophies in Scotland. I'm sure he'd rather have the memory of a promotion than be a Town legend as harsh as that may be to hear.
People are being needlessly critical IMO |
Yes we have to be realistic or we might as well say Edwards should still be at Pboro without getting an international call up. [Post edited 15 Oct 2018 18:44]
| | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
