Starting XI next season as it stand 09:30 - Mar 16 with 3063 views | Bluefish | Bart Emmanuel Chanbers Woolfenden Kenlock Skuse Downes Bishop Edwards Lankester Harrison Subs Dozzell Nolan Jackson Nydam Nsiala Sears? I am not fully convinced by Edwards still but we are lacking width. The CM options are excellent, you could easily bring in Dozzell and Nolan without loss of quality. I would rather have that team every week and finish 7th than bring in a load of journeyman players I would also rather player 2 up top so perhaps losing Edwards and bring in Nolan to then play a diamond [Post edited 16 Mar 2019 9:32]
| |
| | |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:51 - Mar 16 with 589 views | Herbivore |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:47 - Mar 16 by Marshalls_Mullet | They didn't sign him for their Champ season... that doesn't mean he's not good enough for L1!! He was a regular starter in a promotion winning team. Hence he is good enough to play well in L1 if managed properly. He lost his place in Shrewsbury team when the manager changed, that does mean PL can't get a tune out of him. It's daft to write him off, when he's a proven L1 promotion winner. |
If he was an important part of their side why didn't they try to keep him though? He was available. On what I've seen I don't especially rate him. He's a unit but I'm not sure he can play football. | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:51 - Mar 16 with 587 views | GeoffSentence |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 09:50 - Mar 16 by ThisIsMyUsername | These threads are completely pointless as no one knows what the squad will look like. |
It's fun to speculate though | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:54 - Mar 16 with 578 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:51 - Mar 16 by Herbivore | If he was an important part of their side why didn't they try to keep him though? He was available. On what I've seen I don't especially rate him. He's a unit but I'm not sure he can play football. |
Maybe because they thought he was a good L1 player, but not what they need for the Champ. Bit like Rhodes and Bamford are good for promotion teams, but not good enough for the prem. | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:58 - Mar 16 with 577 views | Herbivore |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:54 - Mar 16 by Marshalls_Mullet | Maybe because they thought he was a good L1 player, but not what they need for the Champ. Bit like Rhodes and Bamford are good for promotion teams, but not good enough for the prem. |
Rotherham haven't drastically overhauled the side that took them up, if he was an important player for them - as you've claimed - it makes no sense that they wouldn't have come in for him when he was available. They were in for Kieffer Moore after his loan spell. | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:00 - Mar 16 with 570 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:58 - Mar 16 by Herbivore | Rotherham haven't drastically overhauled the side that took them up, if he was an important player for them - as you've claimed - it makes no sense that they wouldn't have come in for him when he was available. They were in for Kieffer Moore after his loan spell. |
To avoid going around in circles, I'll agree to differ. Let's see how it pans out. | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:02 - Mar 16 with 565 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 12:58 - Mar 16 by Herbivore | Rotherham haven't drastically overhauled the side that took them up, if he was an important player for them - as you've claimed - it makes no sense that they wouldn't have come in for him when he was available. They were in for Kieffer Moore after his loan spell. |
As an aside. When they in for Kiefer... they were still in L1, in Jan, and he was their top scorer. | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:02 - Mar 16 with 563 views | Herbivore |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:02 - Mar 16 by Marshalls_Mullet | As an aside. When they in for Kiefer... they were still in L1, in Jan, and he was their top scorer. |
Yeah. He was an important player for them so they tried to sign him. Funny that. | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:08 - Mar 16 with 555 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:02 - Mar 16 by Herbivore | Yeah. He was an important player for them so they tried to sign him. Funny that. |
As a League 1 player. It's OK, we can overlook that your knowledge was lacking on the KF situation. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:10 - Mar 16 with 553 views | Herbivore |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:08 - Mar 16 by Marshalls_Mullet | As a League 1 player. It's OK, we can overlook that your knowledge was lacking on the KF situation. |
Yeah. I'm sure they only wanted him on a permanent deal until the end of the season. | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:16 - Mar 16 with 548 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:10 - Mar 16 by Herbivore | Yeah. I'm sure they only wanted him on a permanent deal until the end of the season. |
One last time... the fact that Rotherham didn't choose to sign Josh for a CHAMPIONSHIP campaign, doesn't mean he isn't a good LEAGUE ONE player. #LeagueOnePromotionWINNER We can't keep going around in circles love, agree to differ on this one, let's see how it pans out. Have a good day. X x x x | |
| |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:17 - Mar 16 with 545 views | Herbivore |
Starting XI next season as it stand on 13:16 - Mar 16 by Marshalls_Mullet | One last time... the fact that Rotherham didn't choose to sign Josh for a CHAMPIONSHIP campaign, doesn't mean he isn't a good LEAGUE ONE player. #LeagueOnePromotionWINNER We can't keep going around in circles love, agree to differ on this one, let's see how it pans out. Have a good day. X x x x |
Equally the fact he got sent back from Shrewsbury suggests he's not a good League 1 player. Enjoy your day day babe. | |
| |
| |