Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
That has to be the structure going forwards 20:16 - Jan 1 with 748 viewskizaitfc

Still need KVY back and I think a better CB is needed.

If one came available I'd look to bring in a decent CM who can carry and run with the ball but obviously they are not freely available.

Oh and put Holy back in goal. He is our player and just the passion of the man makes him the better option to Norris. Norris when he came over to the away fans before the start of the game looked like a guy who'd rather be at home

Poll: Mick in or out? (not a dig at Mick just want to see the overall opinion on here)

0
That has to be the structure going forwards on 20:47 - Jan 1 with 711 viewshomer_123

Need a second ball playing CB in for Wilson in that formation.

Ade Akinbiyi couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo...
Poll: Has Omari travelled?

1
That has to be the structure going forwards on 21:01 - Jan 1 with 679 viewsFixed_It

Your second paragraph. Teddy Bishop.

Ready! Steady! Cook!
Poll: Club v. Country - which comes first for you?

1
That has to be the structure going forwards on 21:08 - Jan 1 with 656 viewsHerbivore

If we're going to persist with three at the back we need d a new CB. We don't have three CBs that can comfortably play in that system which is why it's generally not worked for us.

I do think people are desperate to try and cling on to today as being a big step forward. We drew at a badly out of form and incredibly limited Wycombe. We played okay but no more than that. It was better than our last couple of performances but we need to improve a fair bit if we hope to go up. I'm not sure we're any closer to working out how to set up to get out of this league.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
That has to be the structure going forwards on 21:51 - Jan 1 with 615 viewskizaitfc

That has to be the structure going forwards on 21:08 - Jan 1 by Herbivore

If we're going to persist with three at the back we need d a new CB. We don't have three CBs that can comfortably play in that system which is why it's generally not worked for us.

I do think people are desperate to try and cling on to today as being a big step forward. We drew at a badly out of form and incredibly limited Wycombe. We played okay but no more than that. It was better than our last couple of performances but we need to improve a fair bit if we hope to go up. I'm not sure we're any closer to working out how to set up to get out of this league.


Throughout the season we have looked strongest with wingbacks IMO

It allows 2 up front, garbut in his correct position and to have Judge as a number 10

Poll: Mick in or out? (not a dig at Mick just want to see the overall opinion on here)

0
That has to be the structure going forwards on 21:56 - Jan 1 with 607 viewsHerbivore

That has to be the structure going forwards on 21:51 - Jan 1 by kizaitfc

Throughout the season we have looked strongest with wingbacks IMO

It allows 2 up front, garbut in his correct position and to have Judge as a number 10


We really haven't. Around half the time we've set up with three at the back we've had to change back to a back four mid-game because it hasn't been working. It doesn't suit our CBs at all to be in a back three.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

-1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025