| EFL statement just now. Playoffs only 4 teams 13:42 - May 21 with 5635 views | Illinoisblue |
As it should be. Lambert out. |  |
| |  |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:15 - May 22 with 499 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:10 - May 22 by BrixtonBlue |
I think this is wishful thinking fella. I'm sure Bully could offer more insight, but Lambert could definitely argue that legally speaking the season wasn't concluded.
"no one (knows)... the wording but they almost certainly won’t specify the season has to be complete."
I'd disagree with this statement. I'd say if there's a 'failure to reach the play offs' clause it will likely say, "If at the completion of the season we have not reached a play off position, the owner reserves the right to terminate the contract."
You're not going to have a 'failure to reach the play offs' clause at some random point in the season, it's OBVIOUSLY going to be at the end.
Any decent lawyer would destroy our assertion that the season is complete and Lambert's sacking is thus fair. |
Haha you what?
You’ve never seen a legal contract before have you...? 🤣 |  |
| |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:15 - May 22 with 499 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:12 - May 22 by vapour_trail |
Whilst the EFL can classify the season as completed, it feels bang in the zone for an unfair dismissal claim if the failure to secure promotion clause is invoked.
I’m with the man dollers on this one. His breathing training has delivered him a clear mind. |
Ha! |  |
| |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:16 - May 22 with 494 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:12 - May 22 by vapour_trail |
Whilst the EFL can classify the season as completed, it feels bang in the zone for an unfair dismissal claim if the failure to secure promotion clause is invoked.
I’m with the man dollers on this one. His breathing training has delivered him a clear mind. |
I’ve already said it will put any clauses in doubt, I just don’t think anyone can say with certainty either way | |
| |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:20 - May 22 with 480 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:15 - May 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Haha you what?
You’ve never seen a legal contract before have you...? 🤣 |
And then you resort to insults instead of discussing like an adult.
I'm done. We'll see who's right. | |
| |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:29 - May 22 with 460 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:20 - May 22 by BrixtonBlue |
And then you resort to insults instead of discussing like an adult.
I'm done. We'll see who's right. |
Insults? Christ
I think if you’ve ever seen a legal contract you’d realise how laughable that wording was
And whilst you may be desperate to be proved right we’ll almost certainly never know I’m afraid. If Lambert is sacked we won’t know the terms, and him staying in a job will be proof of nothing other than Evans has decided he should remain in charge for whatever reason
Only a protracted legal battle would give any clarity - and that happening would support that it’s not clear cut either way [Post edited 22 May 2020 13:29]
| |
| |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:32 - May 22 with 454 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:29 - May 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Insults? Christ
I think if you’ve ever seen a legal contract you’d realise how laughable that wording was
And whilst you may be desperate to be proved right we’ll almost certainly never know I’m afraid. If Lambert is sacked we won’t know the terms, and him staying in a job will be proof of nothing other than Evans has decided he should remain in charge for whatever reason
Only a protracted legal battle would give any clarity - and that happening would support that it’s not clear cut either way [Post edited 22 May 2020 13:29]
|
Of course it's an insult, every adult of working age has seen a legal contract. I was writing the gist not the exact wording FFS! | |
| |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:36 - May 22 with 449 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:32 - May 22 by BrixtonBlue |
Of course it's an insult, every adult of working age has seen a legal contract. I was writing the gist not the exact wording FFS! |
It clearly wasn’t an insult
For future reference, things like this are insults:
| |
| |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:40 - May 22 with 443 views | Libero |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:36 - May 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
It clearly wasn’t an insult
For future reference, things like this are insults:
|
 |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 14:04 - May 22 with 414 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Hopefully we can get rid of him now..... on 13:36 - May 22 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
It clearly wasn’t an insult
For future reference, things like this are insults:
|
The rules change when it's Blubbers. | |
| |
| EFL statement just now. Playoffs only 4 teams on 14:32 - May 22 with 393 views | Wickets |
| EFL statement just now. Playoffs only 4 teams on 13:59 - May 21 by Marshalls_Mullet |
Good.
Fair enough that we miss the cut, but I really didn't want to see Steve Evans in the mix!! |
Dont think their can possible be in it can they ? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
