I presume the Kieffer Moore 20:22 - Jul 8 with 2730 views | Guthrum | scoring goals for Wigan in the Championship (including today) is a different player then the one with the same name who was slightly rubbish for us in 2017? If not, quite a turn-around. |  |
| |  |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 11:49 - Jul 9 with 321 views | Swansea_Blue |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 11:30 - Jul 9 by bournemouthblue | That's the one, they all blur into one So we did have a chance to look at him again and we didn't What we would do for him now |
He'd have been a half decent option in this league - seems his level. He did well at Rotherham (L1). And then did well at Barnsley only when they were in L1, not so good in The Championship. He's not been particularly prolific this year in the championship either (although maybe he's brings other things to the team as I haven't seen him). I'd rather Norwood I think, but I'd rather Keiffer for his physical presence than Keane. |  |
|  |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 11:54 - Jul 9 with 318 views | Herbivore |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 11:30 - Jul 9 by bournemouthblue | That's the one, they all blur into one So we did have a chance to look at him again and we didn't What we would do for him now |
The intention was to have a look at him but he wanted to go and at the time he was very saleable in a way he wouldn't have been after 5 months of warming our bench. He'd be a decent option at this level but you can't keep a player on the basis that you might get relegated in a couple of years. |  |
|  |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 12:02 - Jul 9 with 314 views | Swansea_Blue |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 11:54 - Jul 9 by Herbivore | The intention was to have a look at him but he wanted to go and at the time he was very saleable in a way he wouldn't have been after 5 months of warming our bench. He'd be a decent option at this level but you can't keep a player on the basis that you might get relegated in a couple of years. |
Given our recent past, keeping a player on the basis that we might get relegated in a couple of years would be a sensible strategy! |  |
|  |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 13:13 - Jul 9 with 279 views | bournemouthblue |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 11:48 - Jul 9 by PhilTWTD | We did, although if we'd played him after he returned from Rotherham he wouldn't have been able to move that January when we were at what looked like the top of the Kieffer Moore market. |
That's the rules being a bit of an ass then? I can remember suggesting we had a look at him, at the time given he'd bagged a decent tally for Rotherham I assume he could have only have gone back to Rotherham in that case? |  |
|  |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 13:19 - Jul 9 with 271 views | tractordownsouth |
I presume the Kieffer Moore on 21:50 - Jul 8 by Stenvict | Unfortunately, many fans had already made their mind up when we signed him as a Forest Green reject for £20k and decided he was rubbish. He didn't really get a chance here. I can understand why, as MM was under pressure to get results. Alas, he has made us a little bit of money since leaving. |
To be fair, he was absolute horsesh1t whenever he played here |  |
|  |
| |