| Cummings on 17:52 - May 26 with 292 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Cummings on 15:27 - May 26 by HARRY10 |
errr.... it is an enquiry
whereby questions are put to him - it is not an unchallenged 'my side of the story' speech
much as with the cretinous defence of Johnson being put out
that has because Cummings gave a very questionable explanation of two events last year, any evidence he gives this time should not be regarded as being trustworthy
an idiocy that were it to hold sway, would make any 'supergrass' or Queens evidence trial worthless |
‘errr.... it is an enquiry’ - no sh*t Sherlock
‘whereby questions are put to him - it is not an unchallenged 'my side of the story' speech’ - yes, and he would have answered those questions in the manner best for Dominic Cummings
‘much as with the cretinous defence of Johnson being put out’ - huh?
‘that has because Cummings gave a very questionable explanation of two events last year, any evidence he gives this time should not be regarded as being trustworthy’ - nope, no idea what that’s supposed to mean either, that’s just a collection of jumbled words
‘an idiocy that were it to hold sway, would make any 'supergrass' or Queens evidence trial worthless’ - yes, that’s why those types of evidence are generally held with a much higher level of suspicion and often discounted or easily discredited
Bless |  |
|  |
| Cummings on 19:33 - May 26 with 222 views | HARRY10 |
| Cummings on 17:23 - May 26 by Herbivore |
Not really. We knew Johnson wasn't fit to be PM, that Hancock is a feck up, that Number 10 operates in chaos. No new news there really. In normal times some of it might have been shocking, but now it seems we've come to accept that the government is a sh!t show with a shrug of the shoulders. Apparently it's been "priced in" that Johnson and his cabinet aren't fit for office, so all good in the hood. |
"We knew "
Who is this 'we' ?
Certainly not those oosting on this thread, as the guff that gets regularly trotted out on here by the forelock tuggers, has always been one of absolute denial of that supposed shared understanding.
Evidence of that 'knowledge' was laid before a select committee rather than as copy in the media. A situation that required a response from the PM. A chance to utterly refute and deny those words.
That there came no denial throws up the thought that there is more evidence that exists and this was merely a not too well concealed elephant trap. It also puts this well into the public domain, as it is now seen as being 'official'.
Whether this brings forward the independent inquiry into Covid failings by the government it will have to be seen, but as with Operation Yewtree it will undoubtedly cause olthers to come forward
The beginning of the beginning to paraphrase. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
