| Interesting little stat about our strikers. 13:57 - Oct 31 with 564 views | OriginalMarkyP |
league career goals per game ratio.
(bearing in mind that goals per game in one up top football team must be the most important stat for a main striker).
Bonne: 0.29
Pigott: 0.29
Norwood: 0.37 [Post edited 31 Oct 2021 15:49]
|  |
| |  |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:05 - Oct 31 with 518 views | wkj |
The most important stat for the main striker is form. [Post edited 31 Oct 2021 14:05]
|  |
| |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:07 - Oct 31 with 505 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Lies, damn lies and statistics.
First, why does goals per game have to be the most important stat?
Second, which division are these in and for teams that score how many goals and when playing as a lone striker or in a two or what?
Third, these stats are clearly wrong. None of those players average a goal a game over their careers, let alone above that. |  |
| |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:12 - Oct 31 with 479 views | ZXBlue |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:07 - Oct 31 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Lies, damn lies and statistics.
First, why does goals per game have to be the most important stat?
Second, which division are these in and for teams that score how many goals and when playing as a lone striker or in a two or what?
Third, these stats are clearly wrong. None of those players average a goal a game over their careers, let alone above that. |
Err- its games per goal. |  | | |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:13 - Oct 31 with 472 views | wkj |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:12 - Oct 31 by ZXBlue |
Err- its games per goal. |
So if the stat is games per goal, that means Norwood is the least productive of all three? | |
| |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:15 - Oct 31 with 463 views | ZXBlue |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:13 - Oct 31 by wkj |
So if the stat is games per goal, that means Norwood is the least productive of all three? |
I assume that is the point being made. Perhaps i am mistaken. | | | |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:16 - Oct 31 with 459 views | wkj |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:15 - Oct 31 by ZXBlue |
I assume that is the point being made. Perhaps i am mistaken. |
I think the OP is trying to say the stat is Goals per game and imply that Norwood is the best of all three. | |
| |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:19 - Oct 31 with 449 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:16 - Oct 31 by wkj |
I think the OP is trying to say the stat is Goals per game and imply that Norwood is the best of all three. |
Certainly phrased as if that is the point they are trying to make. Certainly stated as goals per game (which doesn't take much thought to realise is completely wrong).
A further consideration is what constitutes a game? Is this any appearance regardless of minutes played or total 90 minutes played? | |
| |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:21 - Oct 31 with 443 views | wkj |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:19 - Oct 31 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Certainly phrased as if that is the point they are trying to make. Certainly stated as goals per game (which doesn't take much thought to realise is completely wrong).
A further consideration is what constitutes a game? Is this any appearance regardless of minutes played or total 90 minutes played? |
I really don't know, but if it was goals per game we'd have 3 genuine contenders for the Ballon d'Or | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:24 - Oct 31 with 430 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:21 - Oct 31 by wkj |
I really don't know, but if it was goals per game we'd have 3 genuine contenders for the Ballon d'Or |
We would only have to play each of them for at least part of a match and we would be averaging 9.5 goals per game. Even our defence couldn't stop us winning every match then! [Post edited 31 Oct 2021 14:24]
| |
| |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 15:13 - Oct 31 with 370 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:21 - Oct 31 by wkj |
I really don't know, but if it was goals per game we'd have 3 genuine contenders for the Ballon d'Or |
It’s goals per game but the OP seemingly has no idea how to do maths and has multiplied the answer by 10 for some reason
As others have pointed out it isn’t really relevant, given that most of Norwood’s career has been spent in non league
And I say that as someone who thinks Norwood would probably bag a decent amount in this side, but equally it’s obvious Cook doesn’t fancy him for a variety of reasons and hard to be too upset about that given the number of chances he’s been given here already |  |
| |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 15:50 - Oct 31 with 322 views | OriginalMarkyP |
| Interesting little stat about our strikers. on 14:07 - Oct 31 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Lies, damn lies and statistics.
First, why does goals per game have to be the most important stat?
Second, which division are these in and for teams that score how many goals and when playing as a lone striker or in a two or what?
Third, these stats are clearly wrong. None of those players average a goal a game over their careers, let alone above that. |
sorry, updated | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
