| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) 17:07 - Nov 20 with 621 views | carlisleaway |
|  | | |  |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:10 - Nov 20 with 601 views | borge |
Drop Edwards, get Celina on the left and then either play two up front or get Fraser or Chaplin in the role that Celina has been playing. |  | | |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:15 - Nov 20 with 568 views | StokieBlue |
So drop the two players who look the most threatening?
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:17 - Nov 20 with 555 views | StokieBlue |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:10 - Nov 20 by borge |
Drop Edwards, get Celina on the left and then either play two up front or get Fraser or Chaplin in the role that Celina has been playing. |
Chaplin did far less than Celina did in that role today?
Celina seems to need to play like Ronaldo circa 2010 to get any leeway from some on here.
SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:18 - Nov 20 with 540 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:15 - Nov 20 by StokieBlue |
So drop the two players who look the most threatening?
SB |
He said either, not both. Edwards is threatening but can't shoot or pass successfully at the end of it, so what's the point? Celina was largely quiet but can unlock a defence. So I'd agree with the OP, drop one of them. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:20 - Nov 20 with 527 views | jayessess |
You might as well just say Cook Out because there's no chance he's doing that. |  |
| |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:22 - Nov 20 with 513 views | urbanblue |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:18 - Nov 20 by The_Flashing_Smile |
He said either, not both. Edwards is threatening but can't shoot or pass successfully at the end of it, so what's the point? Celina was largely quiet but can unlock a defence. So I'd agree with the OP, drop one of them. |
Yes, and use one of them as an impact sub. We need to get left back sorted too. Clements' inexperience showed today. What happened to the marauding full backs getting to the line? We missed Burns today. |  | | |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:25 - Nov 20 with 499 views | BluedanW |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:20 - Nov 20 by jayessess |
You might as well just say Cook Out because there's no chance he's doing that. |
Well if the guy is so stubborn not to change his tactics to suit a certain game and opposition then maybe it is time for him to go. No plan B. Only against Wycombe and Oldham have we looked like winning from behind and both them gamed stemmed from mistakes by the opposition not tactical magic from cook | | | |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:27 - Nov 20 with 482 views | wkj |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:17 - Nov 20 by StokieBlue |
Chaplin did far less than Celina did in that role today?
Celina seems to need to play like Ronaldo circa 2010 to get any leeway from some on here.
SB |
Dunno Stokie. I thought Chaplin was immense.  |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:28 - Nov 20 with 477 views | jayessess |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:25 - Nov 20 by BluedanW |
Well if the guy is so stubborn not to change his tactics to suit a certain game and opposition then maybe it is time for him to go. No plan B. Only against Wycombe and Oldham have we looked like winning from behind and both them gamed stemmed from mistakes by the opposition not tactical magic from cook |
I think if we're going to get anywhere this season Plan A is going to have to work more often than not. | |
| |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:34 - Nov 20 with 439 views | BluedanW |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:28 - Nov 20 by jayessess |
I think if we're going to get anywhere this season Plan A is going to have to work more often than not. |
Tottenham friend of mine reckons we won the league in 1962 as Bill Nicholson refused to change his tactics against Ipswich despite players such as blanchflower trying to get him to change them.
Then he finally changed them in the charity shield and they mullered us. | | | |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:35 - Nov 20 with 423 views | StokieBlue |
| About time Cook played 2 up front and dropped either Celina or Edwards (n/t) on 17:18 - Nov 20 by The_Flashing_Smile |
He said either, not both. Edwards is threatening but can't shoot or pass successfully at the end of it, so what's the point? Celina was largely quiet but can unlock a defence. So I'd agree with the OP, drop one of them. |
The second option was to keep the same formation and drop Celina for Chaplin or Fraser.
He wasn't great today but he still had 3 shots on target.
SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
