Forum | Not great, not terrible. by Illinoisblue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Not great, not terrible. 13:24 - Apr 16 with 649 views

We play nice passing football with only occasional actual threat to the opposition. But we all knew that already.

	62 - 78 - 81
Poll:	What sport is the most corrupt?

Not great, not terrible. on 13:28 - Apr 16 with 619 views

Bobsthename

Burns looks off the pace,Morsey yet to impose himself, Norwood not the striker we need misses too many chances,
We need to wake up.

Not great, not terrible. on 13:28 - Apr 16 with 611 views

chicoazul

We do tend to come inside a bit often in the final third which I put down to two inside out players in those wider positions. But we keep the ball very nicely and if we had a decent centre forward would be at least one up by now.
Woolfenden is class innit.

	In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll:	With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

Not great, not terrible. on 13:29 - Apr 16 with 601 views

jasondozzell

Entertaining game. We have played some great stuff. I know they've been on a poor run, but we must remember that Rotherham have bossed this league for most of the season.

McKenna is instilling really good habits. Ball playing CBs, great tempo, some lovely passing in midfield. I think we're heading in right direction.

I do agree though that we need to create more opportunities/different opportunities. But that will come. We are playing consistently well and players look really connected to plan. Good Times ahead!

Not great, not terrible. on 13:30 - Apr 16 with 586 views

FrimleyBlue

Same as I said recently.
Replace the final third and its perfect.

	a niche perspective
Poll:	We've had Kuqi v Pablo.. so Broadhead or Celina?
Blog:	Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

Not great, not terrible. on 13:36 - Apr 16 with 497 views

Bluroo

Not great, not terrible. on 13:29 - Apr 16 by jasondozzell

I think we’re creating enough to win, as usual.
The Norwood miss and the low cross from Thompson are tap ins. If Burns hadn’t strayed offside that could have been a 3rd clear cut chance. That’s 3 in a half away to a promotion chasing side.

Not great, not terrible. on 13:38 - Apr 16 with 469 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Not great, not terrible. on 13:28 - Apr 16 by Bobsthename
Burns looks off the pace,Morsey yet to impose himself, Norwood not the striker we need misses too many chances, We need to wake up.

"misses too many chances".

How many have we created for him today?

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Not great, not terrible. on 13:39 - Apr 16 with 460 views

NthQldITFC

Not great, not terrible. on 13:28 - Apr 16 by chicoazul
We do tend to come inside a bit often in the final third which I put down to two inside out players in those wider positions. But we keep the ball very nicely and if we had a decent centre forward would be at least one up by now. Woolfenden is class innit.

Woolfenden is class. He is in control of absolutely everything he does at the moment. The way he jockeys an attacker, not letting him turn and looking to get a foot in continuously without ever over-committing himself is excellent. Donacien much the same.

	⚔ Long live the Duke of Punuar ⚔
Poll:	How would you feel about a UK Identity Card?

Not great, not terrible. on 13:41 - Apr 16 with 446 views

jas0999

A few bookings now.

Not great, not terrible. on 13:46 - Apr 16 with 433 views

Bobsthename

Not great, not terrible. on 13:38 - Apr 16 by Nthsuffolkblue
"misses too many chances". How many have we created for him today?

It’s a fault he has in all games he plays in go on then tell me the pluses in his game.
Be glad when his gone.

-1

Not great, not terrible. on 13:51 - Apr 16 with 408 views

JDB23

Rotherham weren’t very good and have to feel they will improve second half (which already looks like they are). Yet again we fail to take advantage when on top, have to see if it costs us.

Not great, not terrible. on 13:55 - Apr 16 with 389 views

Bobsthename

Not great, not terrible. on 13:28 - Apr 16 by Bobsthename
Burns looks off the pace,Morsey yet to impose himself, Norwood not the striker we need misses too many chances, We need to wake up.

oh add Bakinson to that list poor indeed.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread