Not a penalty in my eyes 19:12 - Dec 5 with 952 views | Bobsthename | Geezer came in on the defenders blind side. |  | | |  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:13 - Dec 5 with 943 views | Crock | Rubbish goalkeeping for the penalty. |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:14 - Dec 5 with 941 views | Nthsuffolkblue | Nicked the ball off him before the defender caught his foot. Definite pen. EDIT: nothing in the rules to say you cannot tackle from the blindside. [Post edited 5 Dec 2022 19:15]
|  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:15 - Dec 5 with 920 views | Cafe_Newman | Absolute madness. Where was VAR to confirm that Richarlison fell over? |  | |  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:16 - Dec 5 with 906 views | Mullet |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:14 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue | Nicked the ball off him before the defender caught his foot. Definite pen. EDIT: nothing in the rules to say you cannot tackle from the blindside. [Post edited 5 Dec 2022 19:15]
|
Why was there no VAR check? Ref obviously overruled it, but seems odd given how much they used it in some games for the most minor or subtle things. |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 with 889 views | Scuzzer |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:14 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue | Nicked the ball off him before the defender caught his foot. Definite pen. EDIT: nothing in the rules to say you cannot tackle from the blindside. [Post edited 5 Dec 2022 19:15]
|
Nah....tackling from behind has been a foul for decades. The defender was in the process of clearing the ball...no challenge was made on the Brazilian. |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 with 885 views | Meadowlark | Also made no contact.......in the quick replays they showed. |  | |  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:22 - Dec 5 with 842 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 by Scuzzer | Nah....tackling from behind has been a foul for decades. The defender was in the process of clearing the ball...no challenge was made on the Brazilian. |
Which rule states that "tackling from behind" is a foul? |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:24 - Dec 5 with 828 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 by Meadowlark | Also made no contact.......in the quick replays they showed. |
Richarlison made no contact when pinching the ball. The defender's swing at the ball then misses the ball and hits Richarlison's foot. There was no VAR check because it was a clear penalty. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:25 - Dec 5 with 812 views | Dubtractor |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:24 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue | Richarlison made no contact when pinching the ball. The defender's swing at the ball then misses the ball and hits Richarlison's foot. There was no VAR check because it was a clear penalty. |
The very very simple giveaway, is that not one Korean player protested the decision at all. |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:27 - Dec 5 with 800 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:22 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue | Which rule states that "tackling from behind" is a foul? |
And, if it was, Macauley Bonne would never have been able to score that goal against Wednesday. |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:27 - Dec 5 with 798 views | Mullet |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:25 - Dec 5 by Dubtractor | The very very simple giveaway, is that not one Korean player protested the decision at all. |
Maybe they're just being polite? |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:28 - Dec 5 with 788 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:27 - Dec 5 by Mullet | Maybe they're just being polite? |
Beautiful goal there. |  |
|  |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 20:26 - Dec 5 with 703 views | Cafe_Newman |
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:25 - Dec 5 by Dubtractor | The very very simple giveaway, is that not one Korean player protested the decision at all. |
I've known Koreans for decades. The only thing I've known them to complain about is poor quality wifi or phone network. |  | |  |
| |