Blubbers 12:09 - Feb 7 with 1395 views | chicoazul | I for one am keen to know what he’s making of this season. Can someone ask him or unban him or something? |  |
| |  |
Blubbers on 12:12 - Feb 7 with 1368 views | FifeITFC | Go on Twitter and ask him yourself. |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 12:19 - Feb 7 with 1344 views | chicoazul |
Blubbers on 12:12 - Feb 7 by FifeITFC | Go on Twitter and ask him yourself. |
I don’t have Twitter. |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 12:22 - Feb 7 with 1311 views | Oldsmoker | Sorry - you mean Bluefish. I thought you were name-calling the posters from last Saturday night. |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 with 1193 views | itfcjoe | This is his 5 point plan: - Drop Keogh for Woolf - Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo - Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well - Put 2 up top when chasing goals - Have balanced benches I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 13:34 - Feb 7 with 1161 views | BlueBadger |
Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 by itfcjoe | This is his 5 point plan: - Drop Keogh for Woolf - Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo - Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well - Put 2 up top when chasing goals - Have balanced benches I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us |
No 'Lambert and Gwion out' as a final point? |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 15:03 - Feb 7 with 1040 views | chicoazul |
Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 by itfcjoe | This is his 5 point plan: - Drop Keogh for Woolf - Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo - Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well - Put 2 up top when chasing goals - Have balanced benches I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us |
Ta luv. Seems pretty sensible which I’m a bit disappointed by. I was hoping for some Blubbers hyperbole. |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 with 1017 views | FrimleyBlue |
Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 by itfcjoe | This is his 5 point plan: - Drop Keogh for Woolf - Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo - Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well - Put 2 up top when chasing goals - Have balanced benches I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us |
Joe. You know your footy. I saw on sat people saying its a great bench because we can swap the attacking players. It's keep up our high press etc.. But do we even have a high pressing game when sides sit deep and just look to hit us on the counter? They aren't trying to pass from the back so our high press is redundant? Wouldn't it be better v teams who sit deep.. to have more technical players on the bench who can maybe find ways of breaking sides down rather than runners. |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 with 1021 views | Steve_M |
Blubbers on 15:03 - Feb 7 by chicoazul | Ta luv. Seems pretty sensible which I’m a bit disappointed by. I was hoping for some Blubbers hyperbole. |
Yeah, the board definitely lacking in hyperbole these days. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Blubbers on 15:07 - Feb 7 with 1003 views | chicoazul |
Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 by Steve_M | Yeah, the board definitely lacking in hyperbole these days. |
Haha! I miss that guy. |  |
|  |
Blubbers on 15:41 - Feb 7 with 925 views | itfcjoe |
Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 by FrimleyBlue | Joe. You know your footy. I saw on sat people saying its a great bench because we can swap the attacking players. It's keep up our high press etc.. But do we even have a high pressing game when sides sit deep and just look to hit us on the counter? They aren't trying to pass from the back so our high press is redundant? Wouldn't it be better v teams who sit deep.. to have more technical players on the bench who can maybe find ways of breaking sides down rather than runners. |
I don't think Cambridge did really try and hit us on counter, think the bench works for us normally as it just gives us more options to change things in the attacking third and don't tire. Think bench only looked bad on Saturday in hindsight because first half was so poor and we burned 3 of our options up |  |
|  |
| |