Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Blubbers 12:09 - Feb 7 with 1394 viewschicoazul

I for one am keen to know what he’s making of this season. Can someone ask him or unban him or something?

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Blubbers on 12:12 - Feb 7 with 1367 viewsFifeITFC

Go on Twitter and ask him yourself.

Poll: Lambert goes, would you prefer an ex-Town connection replacement or not?

0
Blubbers on 12:19 - Feb 7 with 1343 viewschicoazul

Blubbers on 12:12 - Feb 7 by FifeITFC

Go on Twitter and ask him yourself.


I don’t have Twitter.

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Blubbers on 12:22 - Feb 7 with 1310 viewsOldsmoker

Sorry - you mean Bluefish.

I thought you were name-calling the posters from last Saturday night.

Don't believe a word I say. I'm only kidding. Or am I?
Poll: What mode is best?

0
Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 with 1192 viewsitfcjoe

This is his 5 point plan:

- Drop Keogh for Woolf
- Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo
- Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well
- Put 2 up top when chasing goals
- Have balanced benches

I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
Blubbers on 13:34 - Feb 7 with 1160 viewsBlueBadger

Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 by itfcjoe

This is his 5 point plan:

- Drop Keogh for Woolf
- Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo
- Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well
- Put 2 up top when chasing goals
- Have balanced benches

I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us


No 'Lambert and Gwion out' as a final point?

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
Blubbers on 15:03 - Feb 7 with 1039 viewschicoazul

Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 by itfcjoe

This is his 5 point plan:

- Drop Keogh for Woolf
- Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo
- Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well
- Put 2 up top when chasing goals
- Have balanced benches

I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us


Ta luv. Seems pretty sensible which I’m a bit disappointed by. I was hoping for some Blubbers hyperbole.

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 with 1016 viewsFrimleyBlue

Blubbers on 13:32 - Feb 7 by itfcjoe

This is his 5 point plan:

- Drop Keogh for Woolf
- Drop Evans for Humphreys or Luongo
- Stop trying to make every attack go wide and feed to the striker centrally to feet as well
- Put 2 up top when chasing goals
- Have balanced benches

I certainly agree with 1-3, 4 probably correct to mix it up more but not sure 5 suits us


Joe. You know your footy.


I saw on sat people saying its a great bench because we can swap the attacking players. It's keep up our high press etc..

But do we even have a high pressing game when sides sit deep and just look to hit us on the counter? They aren't trying to pass from the back so our high press is redundant?

Wouldn't it be better v teams who sit deep.. to have more technical players on the bench who can maybe find ways of breaking sides down rather than runners.

a niche perspective
Poll: We've had Kuqi v Pablo.. so Broadhead or Celina?
Blog: Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

-1
Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 with 1020 viewsSteve_M

Blubbers on 15:03 - Feb 7 by chicoazul

Ta luv. Seems pretty sensible which I’m a bit disappointed by. I was hoping for some Blubbers hyperbole.


Yeah, the board definitely lacking in hyperbole these days.

Poll: When are the squad numbers out?
Blog: Cycle of Hurt

1
Login to get fewer ads

Blubbers on 15:07 - Feb 7 with 1002 viewschicoazul

Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 by Steve_M

Yeah, the board definitely lacking in hyperbole these days.


Haha!
I miss that guy.

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Blubbers on 15:41 - Feb 7 with 924 viewsitfcjoe

Blubbers on 15:06 - Feb 7 by FrimleyBlue

Joe. You know your footy.


I saw on sat people saying its a great bench because we can swap the attacking players. It's keep up our high press etc..

But do we even have a high pressing game when sides sit deep and just look to hit us on the counter? They aren't trying to pass from the back so our high press is redundant?

Wouldn't it be better v teams who sit deep.. to have more technical players on the bench who can maybe find ways of breaking sides down rather than runners.


I don't think Cambridge did really try and hit us on counter, think the bench works for us normally as it just gives us more options to change things in the attacking third and don't tire.

Think bench only looked bad on Saturday in hindsight because first half was so poor and we burned 3 of our options up

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025