Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Disallowed goal 17:07 - Apr 1 with 4081 viewsDaninthecampo

I really dont care the reason and super happy for the result But what's everyone's opinion on the disallowed goal, a fair bit of holding but nothing definitive
0
Disallowed goal on 12:24 - Apr 2 with 453 viewsTractorWood

Disallowed goal on 12:23 - Apr 2 by Herbivore

Apart from the foul on Burgess and Didz being miles off and affecting play.


You'd be spitting bile if that was given against us. Absolutely nothing in it and not affecting play.
[Post edited 2 Apr 2023 12:25]

I know that was then, but it could be again..
Poll: At present who do you think you'll vote for?

0
Disallowed goal on 12:34 - Apr 2 with 410 viewsHerbivore

Disallowed goal on 12:24 - Apr 2 by TractorWood

You'd be spitting bile if that was given against us. Absolutely nothing in it and not affecting play.
[Post edited 2 Apr 2023 12:25]


He's impeding Walton and goes to play the ball. And Burgess gets a shove. Not sure how you're not seeing it to be honest. If you watch the highlights on the Derby site you'll see the push on Burgess very clearly. The offside is visible from any angle.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Disallowed goal on 12:37 - Apr 2 with 393 viewsTractorWood

Disallowed goal on 12:34 - Apr 2 by Herbivore

He's impeding Walton and goes to play the ball. And Burgess gets a shove. Not sure how you're not seeing it to be honest. If you watch the highlights on the Derby site you'll see the push on Burgess very clearly. The offside is visible from any angle.


Lino doesn't flag?

Again only watched it from 2 angles so you have to appreciate real time decision making that can go both ways.

I try to be objective and consider that nuance can fall either side. Perhaps it might be easier to say everything that goes our way is the correct decision based on watching it 3 times from 3 angles and everything that goes against us is a travesty and there is a plot against us.
[Post edited 2 Apr 2023 12:38]

I know that was then, but it could be again..
Poll: At present who do you think you'll vote for?

-1
Disallowed goal on 12:38 - Apr 2 with 388 viewsCrockerITFC

It was scored by someone who shouldn't have been on the pitch. Cashin was lucky not to be red-carded. So the disallowed goal is just in my opinion
0
Disallowed goal on 12:43 - Apr 2 with 368 viewsHerbivore

Disallowed goal on 12:37 - Apr 2 by TractorWood

Lino doesn't flag?

Again only watched it from 2 angles so you have to appreciate real time decision making that can go both ways.

I try to be objective and consider that nuance can fall either side. Perhaps it might be easier to say everything that goes our way is the correct decision based on watching it 3 times from 3 angles and everything that goes against us is a travesty and there is a plot against us.
[Post edited 2 Apr 2023 12:38]


You're not being objective, you're making the false claim that there was nothing in it. The ref and lino don't have the iFollow view of the incident so the fact you couldn't see it on that angle is irrelevant, but even on that angle at full speed Didz is miles offside and interfering with play. The foul on Burgess, which most think is what the ref gave, is also very clearly visible from other angles, including, one would assume, the angle that the ref was looking from. So you are very much giving a subjective view based on watching it from a not very good angle to see why it was disallowed, which is the opposite of being objective.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

1
Disallowed goal on 12:51 - Apr 2 with 335 viewsVegtablue

Disallowed goal on 12:34 - Apr 2 by Herbivore

He's impeding Walton and goes to play the ball. And Burgess gets a shove. Not sure how you're not seeing it to be honest. If you watch the highlights on the Derby site you'll see the push on Burgess very clearly. The offside is visible from any angle.


I think he's impeding Walton in the first corner but it's less obvious in the second. Interference and offside a bit murky given the direction and speed with which the ball flies in, then the distance between Walton and McG. He's clearly beyond the defenders - does he play for it or is their enough obstruction? Cashin shouldn't be on the pitch as mentioned above. Burgess is interfered with in the air, as often happens. So a soft one IMO but not a robbery. And boy have were deserved a few soft ones in our favour.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025