| Conceding first 19:20 - Nov 11 with 3749 views | textbackup |
Opinions on why it seems to keep happening?
My uneducated guess - information overload, they have so much information pre match they seem to overlook the basics… (total guess, but thought I’d start there)
|  |
| |  |
| Conceding first on 08:54 - Nov 12 with 367 views | SheffordBlue |
| Conceding first on 08:50 - Nov 12 by ElderGrizzly |
Agree we miss Williams and Burns for their athleticism and ability to defend.
We did of course have an established CD partnership of 25+ games until Burgess was swapped out for 1 game.
Will be interesting how McKenna ‘fixes’ it, as his interviews do appear more frustrated with errors making things harder than they need to be. |
In the interview with Brenner Woolley he ascribed it to natural variance and being 'one of those things' rather than anything in particular.
As he pointed out they scored from first set-piece. We narrowly missed from ours and it could easily have been the other way around. |  |
| |
| Conceding first on 09:42 - Nov 12 with 331 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Conceding first on 01:35 - Nov 12 by Stenvict |
Here we go. Davis is the next player completely unnecessarily to be in the firing line. |
Not at all. He's quality. |  |
| |
| Conceding first on 11:02 - Nov 12 with 297 views | brogansnose |
| Conceding first on 08:35 - Nov 12 by textbackup |
The worry is that we concede, Chuck everything at the opposition but it just doesn’t click… and you know the game when it’ll happen! (Hint, they play in yellow) |
Yeah, for me, its not the conceding thing as we're not going to be imperious at the back, its the not putting away those clear cut chances that we had so many of yesterday. I had concerns that it would bite us in the arris when the game should have been over at half time. Still, better than not creating chuff all. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
