Now THAT is a poor var decision 14:48 - Jun 22 with 1212 views | redrickstuhaart | In what way was that intentional? Arm up, but not to block the ball. Entirely natural position for the situation and movement. [Post edited 22 Jun 2024 15:04]
|  | | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 14:50 - Jun 22 with 1188 views | pointofblue | I agree. I'd argue that's a more controversial decision than last night's. |  |
|  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 14:59 - Jun 22 with 1132 views | ibbleobble | It doesn’t need to be intentional. That rule hasn’t been around for a while. |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:00 - Jun 22 with 1126 views | Stu_boy | Disagree, his arm is out, the ball hits the arm therefore clear pen |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:01 - Jun 22 with 1116 views | redrickstuhaart |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 14:59 - Jun 22 by ibbleobble | It doesn’t need to be intentional. That rule hasn’t been around for a while. |
Hence the further reference to natural position. |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:02 - Jun 22 with 1114 views | redrickstuhaart |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:00 - Jun 22 by Stu_boy | Disagree, his arm is out, the ball hits the arm therefore clear pen |
Do you want to quote us the rule that says "if arm is out its handball"? |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:04 - Jun 22 with 1104 views | redrickstuhaart |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:02 - Jun 22 by redrickstuhaart | Do you want to quote us the rule that says "if arm is out its handball"? |
"touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm ***is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement*** for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised" Emphasis added. |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:04 - Jun 22 with 1101 views | Stu_boy |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:02 - Jun 22 by redrickstuhaart | Do you want to quote us the rule that says "if arm is out its handball"? |
The arm was not in a natural position if you dont think that is a blatant action then fair enough your entitled to your opinion |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:05 - Jun 22 with 1096 views | redrickstuhaart |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:04 - Jun 22 by Stu_boy | The arm was not in a natural position if you dont think that is a blatant action then fair enough your entitled to your opinion |
It was out long before the ball got there. It was not there for the ball. Try to move at speed without your arms. Or mark an opponent, without arms. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:13 - Jun 22 with 1069 views | BlueStreak | Give over, that’s a pen all day long. |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 16:12 - Jun 22 with 968 views | redrickstuhaart |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 15:13 - Jun 22 by BlueStreak | Give over, that’s a pen all day long. |
Why? Make reference to the rules in explaining your decision. |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 16:37 - Jun 22 with 925 views | Nutkins_Return | It was an exceptionally easy and correct decision. The rule: A free kick or penalty will be awarded if: the ball goes into the goal after touching an attacker's hand or arm. That's even if accidental. It's also the same if it directly plays the ball to a player who then scores *Just realised people are talking about pen and not the disallowed goal (I think)...or a mix? [Post edited 22 Jun 2024 16:42]
|  |
|  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 17:01 - Jun 22 with 886 views | Stu_boy |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 16:37 - Jun 22 by Nutkins_Return | It was an exceptionally easy and correct decision. The rule: A free kick or penalty will be awarded if: the ball goes into the goal after touching an attacker's hand or arm. That's even if accidental. It's also the same if it directly plays the ball to a player who then scores *Just realised people are talking about pen and not the disallowed goal (I think)...or a mix? [Post edited 22 Jun 2024 16:42]
|
Yes, it was a blatant pen |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 17:11 - Jun 22 with 870 views | redrickstuhaart |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 17:01 - Jun 22 by Stu_boy | Yes, it was a blatant pen |
Nope. Nothing in the rules makes that one a clear pen. |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 17:39 - Jun 22 with 848 views | Stu_boy |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 17:11 - Jun 22 by redrickstuhaart | Nope. Nothing in the rules makes that one a clear pen. |
Clearly the ref saw it differently, if your so good why arn't you at the euro's reffing? |  | |  |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 18:04 - Jun 22 with 826 views | redrickstuhaart |
Now THAT is a poor var decision on 17:39 - Jun 22 by Stu_boy | Clearly the ref saw it differently, if your so good why arn't you at the euro's reffing? |
What a silly response. I disagree with the referee's subjective assessment. Based on what the rules actually say. How about you? Is it just what you "reckon"?? |  | |  |
| |