| Angus Gunn 09:14 - Dec 18 with 2083 views | Wickets |
Charged with misconduct after 3-0 loss to QPR . |  | | |  |
| Angus Gunn on 09:18 - Dec 18 with 2031 views | NthQldITFC |
I don't know, I think he's conducting himself pretty well letting in three goals against QPR.
What the disciplinary board need to understand is that Norwich keepers have a theoretical 20% extra stopping power in their hands, so expecting him to let in four or five, even against another basket case club like QPR is a bit unfair on him. |  |
| |
| Angus Gunn on 09:20 - Dec 18 with 2008 views | Keno |
I guess impersonating a goalkeeper in misconduct? |  |
| |
| Angus Gunn on 09:44 - Dec 18 with 1840 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Angus Gunn on 09:20 - Dec 18 by Keno |
I guess impersonating a goalkeeper in misconduct? |
You beat me to it - dreadful player living off his Dad's name. |  |
| |
| Angus Gunn on 09:56 - Dec 18 with 1765 views | NthQldITFC |
I just put a peg on my snout and went into the sty for a sniff around the old OinkUn. Bit echoey in there these days, just a few old porkers left these days, grumbling as ever.
Not sure what Gunn has done, but the budgies seem to be all up in arms doing the victimisation thing - "the FA hates Norwich..." - which is Stage 4 on the football club disappearing down the leagues ladder.
One of their centre backs has just had two 4 game bans apparently, and "it's not fair!"
I'm almost starting to feel sorry for them, not.  | |
| |
| Angus Gunn on 10:28 - Dec 18 with 1585 views | SheffordBlue |
| Angus Gunn on 09:56 - Dec 18 by NthQldITFC |
I just put a peg on my snout and went into the sty for a sniff around the old OinkUn. Bit echoey in there these days, just a few old porkers left these days, grumbling as ever.
Not sure what Gunn has done, but the budgies seem to be all up in arms doing the victimisation thing - "the FA hates Norwich..." - which is Stage 4 on the football club disappearing down the leagues ladder.
One of their centre backs has just had two 4 game bans apparently, and "it's not fair!"
I'm almost starting to feel sorry for them, not. |
It is a bit odd that McLean was retrospectively charged and given a ban and that they've only now decided to charge Gunn for something that happened in the same game.
The only reason I can think of is that there was some video footage from the tunnel that QPR decided to submit after the refs report had already gone in. |  |
| |
| Angus Gunn on 11:33 - Dec 18 with 1363 views | VanSaParody |
Who? |  | | |
| Angus Gunn on 11:42 - Dec 18 with 1311 views | ParisBlue |
I've been keeping an eye on this and it's quite humorous.
McClean - just back from a 4 match ban - was given a charge just 3 hours before their game at Portsmouth. Norwich immediately appealed and that was rejected causing them to change their lineup at the last minute.
Then a week later another charge from the same game.
Forever in our shadows, the natural hierarchy has been restored. Its a long way back for them now (unless their new US owners throw money at it) |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
