| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 22:13 - Jul 15 with 1533 views | Edmundo |
They need to keep at it, but even more-so the MAGA hardliners need to keep bringing it up: the house of cards will only fall that way. |  |
|  |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 23:06 - Jul 15 with 1448 views | BlueBadger |
That's a magnificent piece of political trolling. |  |
| |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 23:13 - Jul 15 with 1424 views | WicklowBlue |
"vice-president, JD Vance, was evidently called in to mediate, according to CNN."
Not sure JD Vance could mediate his way out of a paper bag, on the moon, the dark side thereof. |  | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 23:43 - Jul 15 with 1355 views | ElderGrizzly |
Mike Johnson (Speaker), said about an hour before the vote that he wanted full transparency on Epstein.
Then of course voted to block it…
|  | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 10:20 - Jul 17 with 955 views | darkhorse28 |
You don’t like the legislation? Doesn’t it help take some power away from a small number of financial instititions? Help the US sell more debt to their own banks, generally stabilise global economies.
There’s a global debt crisis, I’m sure you know.
Without this, they likely won’t be able to sell debt, neither will anyone else, and the world’s financial system as we know it will collapse.
More liquid markets, will make a lot of money, for a lot of people, but it doesn’t change the fact that this bill is hugely progressive for dealing with their economic issues.
Whatever your political ideals, why wouldn’t you want to save hundreds of billions of $ in debt repayments?
Whether you spend it on tax cuts, services, both, they are choices, but saving the money in the first place (and this isn’t DOGE.., it’s literally stopping banks charging more for debt and the US spending its money just to service debt).
Stablecoins will allow the yields to reduce and debt to be sold easier and more cheaply,
Everyone in the US and probably globally, wins.
Maybe not BRICS if they want a’to remove the $ as a reserve currency.
Two things can be true at once.
It can be brilliant legislation, and unfortunately some individuals including the president use it to make money.
My advice. Dont fall in to the trap of being reductive and playing the man, especially with Trump.
That’s to behave just like him!!!
See issues and problems, and try to understand sometimes he’ll be 100% right, even if it’s through his prism of finding ways to make sure he benefits.
He doesn’t bring legislation to make money…, he had billions.
What’s obvious is, he brings the legislation (just taking about this crypto legislation) that works for the US and the world truthfully, then he makes sure his advantage on timing he uses to make money on top.
It’s cynical. But the policy is for the US, then Trump.
You’ll need to park a binary, reductive, tribal hatred, if you want to be on the right side of issues.
To oppose this, is to say paying $100 billion of US money this year alone in additional bank interest to global institutions and fat bankers - is a good thing.
I don’t think you do believe that.
Maybe follow the money …, Hood, Eth, SoFi, most crypto is pumping, Visa etc dumping.
You could have made a lot of money too.
Not from being cynical but by seeing a system where Visa charge businesses a fortune, and YOU pay those fees, as broken!!
Stablecoins also fix that…, MUCH lower transaction fees, so everyone wins.
As you say…, the Democrats look small, petty, and honestly, irrelevant.
The were too risk adverse to the benefits of this in power, because truthfully they were scared of what they don’t understand.
Trump smell weakness.
I don’t like Trump, this is great legislation for everyone.
Both those things can be and are true.
Buy those brands, it’s still an early days trade.
Robinhood, Etherium will underpin (initially) the retail offering and the picks and shovels, SoFi the back end software even for other banks.
Their rise is far from over, it’s just the end of the beginning for them.
JPM, Visa they’ll all have stablecoins, but they are playing catch up.
The US having billions more to spend, bond markets less likely to stop completely and tank global economies, it’s genuinely a good news bill…, there’s no hiding that, don’t have to like the messenger, but the reality isn’t changing. |  | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 11:42 - Jul 17 with 875 views | StokieBlue |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 10:20 - Jul 17 by darkhorse28 |
You don’t like the legislation? Doesn’t it help take some power away from a small number of financial instititions? Help the US sell more debt to their own banks, generally stabilise global economies.
There’s a global debt crisis, I’m sure you know.
Without this, they likely won’t be able to sell debt, neither will anyone else, and the world’s financial system as we know it will collapse.
More liquid markets, will make a lot of money, for a lot of people, but it doesn’t change the fact that this bill is hugely progressive for dealing with their economic issues.
Whatever your political ideals, why wouldn’t you want to save hundreds of billions of $ in debt repayments?
Whether you spend it on tax cuts, services, both, they are choices, but saving the money in the first place (and this isn’t DOGE.., it’s literally stopping banks charging more for debt and the US spending its money just to service debt).
Stablecoins will allow the yields to reduce and debt to be sold easier and more cheaply,
Everyone in the US and probably globally, wins.
Maybe not BRICS if they want a’to remove the $ as a reserve currency.
Two things can be true at once.
It can be brilliant legislation, and unfortunately some individuals including the president use it to make money.
My advice. Dont fall in to the trap of being reductive and playing the man, especially with Trump.
That’s to behave just like him!!!
See issues and problems, and try to understand sometimes he’ll be 100% right, even if it’s through his prism of finding ways to make sure he benefits.
He doesn’t bring legislation to make money…, he had billions.
What’s obvious is, he brings the legislation (just taking about this crypto legislation) that works for the US and the world truthfully, then he makes sure his advantage on timing he uses to make money on top.
It’s cynical. But the policy is for the US, then Trump.
You’ll need to park a binary, reductive, tribal hatred, if you want to be on the right side of issues.
To oppose this, is to say paying $100 billion of US money this year alone in additional bank interest to global institutions and fat bankers - is a good thing.
I don’t think you do believe that.
Maybe follow the money …, Hood, Eth, SoFi, most crypto is pumping, Visa etc dumping.
You could have made a lot of money too.
Not from being cynical but by seeing a system where Visa charge businesses a fortune, and YOU pay those fees, as broken!!
Stablecoins also fix that…, MUCH lower transaction fees, so everyone wins.
As you say…, the Democrats look small, petty, and honestly, irrelevant.
The were too risk adverse to the benefits of this in power, because truthfully they were scared of what they don’t understand.
Trump smell weakness.
I don’t like Trump, this is great legislation for everyone.
Both those things can be and are true.
Buy those brands, it’s still an early days trade.
Robinhood, Etherium will underpin (initially) the retail offering and the picks and shovels, SoFi the back end software even for other banks.
Their rise is far from over, it’s just the end of the beginning for them.
JPM, Visa they’ll all have stablecoins, but they are playing catch up.
The US having billions more to spend, bond markets less likely to stop completely and tank global economies, it’s genuinely a good news bill…, there’s no hiding that, don’t have to like the messenger, but the reality isn’t changing. |
I never specially commented on the legislation. My post was about the amendment.
There is however an awful lot in your post which is incorrect or hyperbole.
SB |  | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 18:59 - Jul 17 with 661 views | darkhorse28 |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 11:42 - Jul 17 by StokieBlue |
I never specially commented on the legislation. My post was about the amendment.
There is however an awful lot in your post which is incorrect or hyperbole.
SB |
Specifically which bits? You said the bill was passed to make Trump money.., it wasn’t, it was passed to save debt repayments, which it will.
Your style seems very reductive, tribal, ad hominem.
You seem to obsess about the person, not what they say.
When it comes to corruption, I try to follow as many congressional stock filings as possible, they tend to be very profitable…, there’s no party political difference in who is or isn’t sticking their snout in the trough, and that’s a measure not an opinion.
Following Nancy, has made me the most money…., Trump doesn’t really buy much that’s all that interesting.
Think I’m about 90% up on Nancy’s trades.., she’s about 700% is it, most years?
How much is she ‘invested’ currently, is it circa $10 million? .., not chump change is it.
So who is and isn’t making money from their insider privilege is a very moot point in the US.
I don’t think anyone comes out of it with any integrity.
That’s why the issues are maybe more important.
I’ll look forward to you pointing out some facts, rather than (yet again) just seeing the person and deciding you don’t like everything.
The inference that the bills don’t benefit the ID and are for Trumpss personal gain, just aren’t true.
Sure he’ll make lots of money, so will Nancy, and every Democrat and Republican from the advisory committee they sit on, that’s just how they roll (sadly).
Who did you think ran the US under the democrats?
Eye watering debt, finance institutions soaking up all their GDP in debt repayments, off shoring all their jobs to modern ‘slave Labour’ in Asia .., for profit.
You don’t genuinely describe that as ‘progressive’ do you?
Ethnic Muslims in China murdered, and suicide nets in factories, where working conditions are so bad, people killnthemselves at work …, and the solution is to put up nets to catch them!
Do you honestly think that’s a kinder style of politics?
What was it Apple and Nike said.
We are there for the skills, they’re good a tooling, not cheap wages…., that’s what evil looks like to me.
Those three global funds, that literally bought the media and politicians.
They don’t have a hard time manipulating someone as reductive and tribal as you do they.
I can’t imagine voting for corruption, modern slavery, and giving all out money to world banks…., and calling it ‘progressive’
It’s sounds…., well regressive.
I have ponder if making Trillions less in interest payments bothers them, and the media they own?
Maybe read their media narrative…, and then you can tell what opinion they’ve given you,
Stablecoins…., saving our bond crisis, lowering inflation, interest rates, and driving GDP.
You’ll benefit a lot…, kicking and screaming no doubt.
Maybe you can set up a just giving for those private equity goliaths you clearly adore.
I’m not sure you see anything beyond tribe, and emotion.
Wake up buddy…, or get left behind.
Your choice.
[Post edited 17 Jul 19:16]
| | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 19:08 - Jul 17 with 645 views | chicoazul |
So they need to do more stuff that doesn’t work? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 19:32 - Jul 17 with 612 views | darkhorse28 |
Loved how you didn’t read your own media source too.
Trump made $600 million …, he did…, but not from Crypto.
Read through the headline, and the agenda, and the facts will paint a more informed picture, then you can make better decisions…, and fill your boots.
They should have run an article on his son…, that’s who holds all the crypto…, what Trumpmmade directly was peanuts…, about 6% of his profits.
The man down the street has a bigger % exposure.
His son and family however…, they have much bigger exposure, his son runs a business in the space.., and disclosed huge Eth positions months ago.
Someone ‘in the know’ made $3 billion on one leveraged trade, within about three minutes when the legislation was announced - 300 x leverage, opened before the announcement, closed minutes later after it…, I don’t know who placed it.., but it was private off the books, and I have seen the actual trade…, corrupt …, or maybe like Nancy, hugely talented.
It’s a game.
The democrats. All bought and paid for too, and equally corrupt.
The main thing is the Bill will be fantastic for crypto and like it or not, it’s going to give you benefits and lots of them.
There is no moral high ground. Just people who haven’t worked it out (yet). | | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 20:05 - Jul 17 with 555 views | StokieBlue |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 18:59 - Jul 17 by darkhorse28 |
Specifically which bits? You said the bill was passed to make Trump money.., it wasn’t, it was passed to save debt repayments, which it will.
Your style seems very reductive, tribal, ad hominem.
You seem to obsess about the person, not what they say.
When it comes to corruption, I try to follow as many congressional stock filings as possible, they tend to be very profitable…, there’s no party political difference in who is or isn’t sticking their snout in the trough, and that’s a measure not an opinion.
Following Nancy, has made me the most money…., Trump doesn’t really buy much that’s all that interesting.
Think I’m about 90% up on Nancy’s trades.., she’s about 700% is it, most years?
How much is she ‘invested’ currently, is it circa $10 million? .., not chump change is it.
So who is and isn’t making money from their insider privilege is a very moot point in the US.
I don’t think anyone comes out of it with any integrity.
That’s why the issues are maybe more important.
I’ll look forward to you pointing out some facts, rather than (yet again) just seeing the person and deciding you don’t like everything.
The inference that the bills don’t benefit the ID and are for Trumpss personal gain, just aren’t true.
Sure he’ll make lots of money, so will Nancy, and every Democrat and Republican from the advisory committee they sit on, that’s just how they roll (sadly).
Who did you think ran the US under the democrats?
Eye watering debt, finance institutions soaking up all their GDP in debt repayments, off shoring all their jobs to modern ‘slave Labour’ in Asia .., for profit.
You don’t genuinely describe that as ‘progressive’ do you?
Ethnic Muslims in China murdered, and suicide nets in factories, where working conditions are so bad, people killnthemselves at work …, and the solution is to put up nets to catch them!
Do you honestly think that’s a kinder style of politics?
What was it Apple and Nike said.
We are there for the skills, they’re good a tooling, not cheap wages…., that’s what evil looks like to me.
Those three global funds, that literally bought the media and politicians.
They don’t have a hard time manipulating someone as reductive and tribal as you do they.
I can’t imagine voting for corruption, modern slavery, and giving all out money to world banks…., and calling it ‘progressive’
It’s sounds…., well regressive.
I have ponder if making Trillions less in interest payments bothers them, and the media they own?
Maybe read their media narrative…, and then you can tell what opinion they’ve given you,
Stablecoins…., saving our bond crisis, lowering inflation, interest rates, and driving GDP.
You’ll benefit a lot…, kicking and screaming no doubt.
Maybe you can set up a just giving for those private equity goliaths you clearly adore.
I’m not sure you see anything beyond tribe, and emotion.
Wake up buddy…, or get left behind.
Your choice.
[Post edited 17 Jul 19:16]
|
Sigh.
Writing a lot doesn't make it correct. If you had bothered to absorb the content of the initial post you would see it's about the Democrats using amendments, not all the stuff you've focused on then made up.
"Specifically which bits? You said the bill was passed to make Trump money.., it wasn’t, it was passed to save debt repayments, which it will."
I never said any such thing. I said he would like the bill and he does from his quotes.
"Your style seems very reductive, tribal, ad hominem.
You seem to obsess about the person, not what they say."
I attempt to deal with the content of posts. It's however unfortunate that many of the worst posts are made by the same people. That's not obsessing about the person, it's tackling consistently poor content.
Interesting that you accuse me of ad hominem whilst engaging in one yourself.
"When it comes to corruption, I try to follow as many congressional stock filings as possible, they tend to be very profitable…, there’s no party political difference in who is or isn’t sticking their snout in the trough, and that’s a measure not an opinion.
Following Nancy, has made me the most money…., Trump doesn’t really buy much that’s all that interesting.
Think I’m about 90% up on Nancy’s trades.., she’s about 700% is it, most years?
How much is she ‘invested’ currently, is it circa $10 million? .., not chump change is it."
This is a poisoning the well fallacy. Look over there, not over here.
I've not mentioned Trump past the fact he would like the bill. I certainly not talked about any specifics and I've not mention Nancy or anyone else. This just looks like you supporting Trump by using logical fallacies to direct the attention elsewhere.
"I’ll look forward to you pointing out some facts, rather than (yet again) just seeing the person and deciding you don’t like everything.
Responding to all the inaccuracies in your first post, especially around crypto and the debt markets would have taken all day and I simply don't have the time. You wouldn't take it on board anyway so there is no point.
"The inference that the bills don’t benefit the ID and are for Trumps personal gain, just aren’t true."
I didn't saw they were for his personal gain, I said that he would like the legislation as it would benefit him. You are conflating two separate things in order to support your man.
"Eye watering debt, finance institutions soaking up all their GDP in debt repayments, off shoring all their jobs to modern ‘slave Labour’ in Asia .., for profit."
The debt was also increased heavily under the Republicans and Trump just passed a bill that could increase it by 4trn over time. This is another logical fallacy "cherry picking".
You are aware that the MAGA merchandise is made in Asia under conditions you have called "slave labour"?
"They don’t have a hard time manipulating someone as reductive and tribal as you do they."
Another ad hominem attack.
Accusing others of being manipulated when you're going out to bat for a convicted rapist who clearly has easily manipulated you and your narrative is an interesting tactic.
"I have ponder if making Trillions less in interest payments bothers them, and the media they own?"
Trumps big, beautiful bill increases the debt payments and if they manage to sell the maximum by 2028 it will reduce the payments by a bit but not trillions.
"Stablecoins…., saving our bond crisis, lowering inflation, interest rates, and driving GDP."
Stablecoins don't do anything for the existing debt burden and they won't stop the US having to issue more debt due to Trumps policies. Even if they manage to sell 2bn USD worth by 2028 (very far from certain) this has knock on effects with regards to bank borrowing and what level of credit they are able to extend customers. Money rarely is generated from nowhere with no consequences.
"Maybe you can set up a just giving for those private equity goliaths you clearly adore."
Another ad hominem attack.
I've not mentioned any democratic policies, private equity firms or anything so this is just really weird.
"I’m not sure you see anything beyond tribe, and emotion."
Another ad hominem attack.
To be honest, your posts in this thread just look like you have a notepad file with lots of sentences in and you paste them if you feel they have anything remotely to do with the subject or they can push your narrative.
SB [Post edited 17 Jul 20:28]
| | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 20:11 - Jul 17 with 541 views | StokieBlue |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 19:32 - Jul 17 by darkhorse28 |
Loved how you didn’t read your own media source too.
Trump made $600 million …, he did…, but not from Crypto.
Read through the headline, and the agenda, and the facts will paint a more informed picture, then you can make better decisions…, and fill your boots.
They should have run an article on his son…, that’s who holds all the crypto…, what Trumpmmade directly was peanuts…, about 6% of his profits.
The man down the street has a bigger % exposure.
His son and family however…, they have much bigger exposure, his son runs a business in the space.., and disclosed huge Eth positions months ago.
Someone ‘in the know’ made $3 billion on one leveraged trade, within about three minutes when the legislation was announced - 300 x leverage, opened before the announcement, closed minutes later after it…, I don’t know who placed it.., but it was private off the books, and I have seen the actual trade…, corrupt …, or maybe like Nancy, hugely talented.
It’s a game.
The democrats. All bought and paid for too, and equally corrupt.
The main thing is the Bill will be fantastic for crypto and like it or not, it’s going to give you benefits and lots of them.
There is no moral high ground. Just people who haven’t worked it out (yet). |
This is once again untrue, he didn't make the entire 600m from crypto I concede but it was 57m which is far more than the 4% you cite.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-reports-tens-millions-income-crypto-ventu
Trump made 57m from one token , 320m in fees from another one split with his partners and the family itself another 400m from a crypt based finance platform.
There is probably a lot more out there still to be declared, to say him and his family aren't gaining from crypto shilling and legislation would be ridiculous.
SB | | | |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 22:22 - Jul 17 with 431 views | darkhorse28 |
| The Democrats need to start doing more of this stuff on 20:05 - Jul 17 by StokieBlue |
Sigh.
Writing a lot doesn't make it correct. If you had bothered to absorb the content of the initial post you would see it's about the Democrats using amendments, not all the stuff you've focused on then made up.
"Specifically which bits? You said the bill was passed to make Trump money.., it wasn’t, it was passed to save debt repayments, which it will."
I never said any such thing. I said he would like the bill and he does from his quotes.
"Your style seems very reductive, tribal, ad hominem.
You seem to obsess about the person, not what they say."
I attempt to deal with the content of posts. It's however unfortunate that many of the worst posts are made by the same people. That's not obsessing about the person, it's tackling consistently poor content.
Interesting that you accuse me of ad hominem whilst engaging in one yourself.
"When it comes to corruption, I try to follow as many congressional stock filings as possible, they tend to be very profitable…, there’s no party political difference in who is or isn’t sticking their snout in the trough, and that’s a measure not an opinion.
Following Nancy, has made me the most money…., Trump doesn’t really buy much that’s all that interesting.
Think I’m about 90% up on Nancy’s trades.., she’s about 700% is it, most years?
How much is she ‘invested’ currently, is it circa $10 million? .., not chump change is it."
This is a poisoning the well fallacy. Look over there, not over here.
I've not mentioned Trump past the fact he would like the bill. I certainly not talked about any specifics and I've not mention Nancy or anyone else. This just looks like you supporting Trump by using logical fallacies to direct the attention elsewhere.
"I’ll look forward to you pointing out some facts, rather than (yet again) just seeing the person and deciding you don’t like everything.
Responding to all the inaccuracies in your first post, especially around crypto and the debt markets would have taken all day and I simply don't have the time. You wouldn't take it on board anyway so there is no point.
"The inference that the bills don’t benefit the ID and are for Trumps personal gain, just aren’t true."
I didn't saw they were for his personal gain, I said that he would like the legislation as it would benefit him. You are conflating two separate things in order to support your man.
"Eye watering debt, finance institutions soaking up all their GDP in debt repayments, off shoring all their jobs to modern ‘slave Labour’ in Asia .., for profit."
The debt was also increased heavily under the Republicans and Trump just passed a bill that could increase it by 4trn over time. This is another logical fallacy "cherry picking".
You are aware that the MAGA merchandise is made in Asia under conditions you have called "slave labour"?
"They don’t have a hard time manipulating someone as reductive and tribal as you do they."
Another ad hominem attack.
Accusing others of being manipulated when you're going out to bat for a convicted rapist who clearly has easily manipulated you and your narrative is an interesting tactic.
"I have ponder if making Trillions less in interest payments bothers them, and the media they own?"
Trumps big, beautiful bill increases the debt payments and if they manage to sell the maximum by 2028 it will reduce the payments by a bit but not trillions.
"Stablecoins…., saving our bond crisis, lowering inflation, interest rates, and driving GDP."
Stablecoins don't do anything for the existing debt burden and they won't stop the US having to issue more debt due to Trumps policies. Even if they manage to sell 2bn USD worth by 2028 (very far from certain) this has knock on effects with regards to bank borrowing and what level of credit they are able to extend customers. Money rarely is generated from nowhere with no consequences.
"Maybe you can set up a just giving for those private equity goliaths you clearly adore."
Another ad hominem attack.
I've not mentioned any democratic policies, private equity firms or anything so this is just really weird.
"I’m not sure you see anything beyond tribe, and emotion."
Another ad hominem attack.
To be honest, your posts in this thread just look like you have a notepad file with lots of sentences in and you paste them if you feel they have anything remotely to do with the subject or they can push your narrative.
SB [Post edited 17 Jul 20:28]
|
You literally said he made £600 million from Crypto, which isn’t true, according the the source YOU linked.
You said he will benefit, but you didn’t mean personally, whilst trying to conflate that he made £600 million in crypto …, make it make sense!
You don’t have time to write a long post correcting my mistakes, whilst writing a longer post, correcting NONE.
But you definitely don’t just focus on the individual.
Please, correct my inaccuracies, I don’t mind being corrected if/when I’m wrong, I like to be right, I love to learn, so correct me…, the reason you can’t is, they’re true.
Hood have agreements with the EU and Eth and SoFi have been doing their back end for years, there’s no guess work, no conjecture, just facts.
As for loosing the well …, it’s not ‘look over there’ because I wasn’t defending the republicans, or Trump.
I don’t vote in the US, historically if likely vote Democrat, but not now, I probably wouldn’t vote.
So I have no agenda, no skin in the game…, it makes it easier to judge facts and evidence.
I read the actual transactions, so that democrats are broadly corrupt isn’t my opinion…, it’s just based on watching them buy and sell stocks.
They’re corrupt (largely) as are lite of republicans.., and yes Trump isn’t adverse to looking after himself either. But he’s measurably no worse than many on both sides.
Not a poison well…, it’s an actual cesspit.
Listen. Some people know more than you (and me) they always do!!! Don’t attack them.., learn from them.., you don’t have to like them, you DO need to learn respect, rather than tribal hatred.
I’m sure a lot of what you think of Trump I’d agree with and is probably true.
That’s meaningless when judging policy!!
MEANINGLESS - your emotions aren’t more important than FACTS
Beasent will be next fed chair
Beasent wants to ‘capitalise the asset side of the balance sheet’
Stablecoins are here.., learn what that means .., even the EU are on board, let that sink in, like, love, or loath, they are bureaucratic and risk averse, it’s already approved. It’s DONE
There are lots of moving pieces.., nothing is certain.., but Trump wants his 1934 moment.
Good will be revalued…, all he needs is peace in Ukraine .., can’t give Russia a good revaluation while they are at war, a trade deal with China, again they hold a lot of gold, a deal has to come first, and he needs Beasent.
Gold will be re-valued to $15k an ounce, might be a different price, and it will happen quickly when those pieces are in place.
Next year at some point. Probably Q1
You better go and learn what that means to you!!
Protect yourself, your loved ones, and go and make generational wealth, but don’t risk what you can’t afford to lose.
Gold in any form, and the $3 trillion the US will put in their balance sheet from selling gold to themselves, will find its way in to assets.
Hold assets, hoard gold, BTC, crypto etc and you’ll make generational wealth.
Or just keep attacking people you don’t know on the internet…, because it’s fun.
Attacking Trump for likes won’t help you .., understanding that next year they’ll like have a budget SURPLUS…, yes, all his debt from this year, wiped off the books.., and a surplus.., that will help you.
Don’t be still trying to get likes for Trump hate.
Learn about the policies, the behaviours, and the impacts.
A devalued $, a re-valued gold, and a world of opportunity.
Debt crisis you say?
Legacy?
Ticks every box.., Beasent has told you EXACTLY what he will do.
So the stablecoin and crypto bills are fantastic for the US.., and every asset on chain eventually is a realistic prospect .., the EU certainly think so.
I won’t post to you again.
More product uses of my time.
But genuinely, good luck and up the town. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
