| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble 17:58 - Sep 20 with 3488 views | Dubtractor |
First half was typical championship fayre, with us creating the better openings.
Second half was an absolute farce, and the game should have been stopped much earlier than it was. You really shouldn't be trying to analyse too much about how we played in that Second half, albeit the sending off was poor from Greaves regardless of conditions. |  |
| |  |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:29 - Sep 21 with 395 views | Herbivore |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:26 - Sep 21 by FrimleyBlue |
Think it's something we need to work on, and quite surprising if we havent really, KM has said many times in recent interviews, pitches will change, the weather etc... it's an obvious thing of course, but because is that obvious, surely we need to be able to adjust accordingly. |
We'll face conditions like yesterday maybe once or twice all season. There is no style of play that's effective in those conditions either, going long becomes a lottery as you don't know if the ball will just stop or skid on, the game becomes even more chaotic. Keeping possession in those conditions is hard but gives you at least some measure of control. |  |
| |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:31 - Sep 21 with 364 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:29 - Sep 21 by Herbivore |
We'll face conditions like yesterday maybe once or twice all season. There is no style of play that's effective in those conditions either, going long becomes a lottery as you don't know if the ball will just stop or skid on, the game becomes even more chaotic. Keeping possession in those conditions is hard but gives you at least some measure of control. |
Yeah I get that, it wasnt really about going long i guess, more none of our short passes out from the back, that is a lottery on a dry day and can go wrong, let alone in those conditions. Just kinda felt like we needed to forget the ball from the back build up, and just get it up the pitch quicker and less chance of the ball getting stuck around our box |  |
| |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:33 - Sep 21 with 347 views | Herbivore |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:31 - Sep 21 by FrimleyBlue |
Yeah I get that, it wasnt really about going long i guess, more none of our short passes out from the back, that is a lottery on a dry day and can go wrong, let alone in those conditions. Just kinda felt like we needed to forget the ball from the back build up, and just get it up the pitch quicker and less chance of the ball getting stuck around our box |
This post is very confusing. It's not about going long but it's about getting forward quickly from the back seems a bit contradictory, mate. Are we teleporting the ball forward? | |
| |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:44 - Sep 21 with 323 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:33 - Sep 21 by Herbivore |
This post is very confusing. It's not about going long but it's about getting forward quickly from the back seems a bit contradictory, mate. Are we teleporting the ball forward? |
Haha good point harbz.
Just meant rather than trying to pass the ball around the. Backline. Having the ball played forward alot more into midfield or out wide rather than our slow build up play.
So not quite long. Just not so short. If that actually makes sense. | |
| |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:48 - Sep 21 with 303 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:44 - Sep 21 by FrimleyBlue |
Haha good point harbz.
Just meant rather than trying to pass the ball around the. Backline. Having the ball played forward alot more into midfield or out wide rather than our slow build up play.
So not quite long. Just not so short. If that actually makes sense. |
Your original post on this had no mention of passing around the backline. You said, "we need to go direct". |  |
| |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:54 - Sep 21 with 273 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:48 - Sep 21 by The_Flashing_Smile |
Your original post on this had no mention of passing around the backline. You said, "we need to go direct". |
Don't revert back to 6 months ago flash and picking out my words and being provocative for the sake of it, i felt it was obvious what i was saying, it clearly wasn't, i've explained what i meant, that's it tbh. no needs for your attempts at scoring twtd points again, im passed all that. have a good day. | |
| |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 11:14 - Sep 21 with 212 views | Dubtractor |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:54 - Sep 21 by FrimleyBlue |
Don't revert back to 6 months ago flash and picking out my words and being provocative for the sake of it, i felt it was obvious what i was saying, it clearly wasn't, i've explained what i meant, that's it tbh. no needs for your attempts at scoring twtd points again, im passed all that. have a good day. |
Yeah, i got what you were saying Frimmers, and fwiw agree that we could benefit from being more direct (not long ball!) at times away from home.
Direct in the way that teams like Palace, Brentford and Forest (under) Nuno were. Offer more of a counter attacking threat and not allowing teams to get their defensive shape set.
Yesterday really was a farce though, so I'm not sure how much it helps in those conditions. | |
| |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 11:55 - Sep 21 with 118 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:54 - Sep 21 by FrimleyBlue |
Don't revert back to 6 months ago flash and picking out my words and being provocative for the sake of it, i felt it was obvious what i was saying, it clearly wasn't, i've explained what i meant, that's it tbh. no needs for your attempts at scoring twtd points again, im passed all that. have a good day. |
What are you talking about 6 months ago? I've never been provocative for the sake of it. I suspect you've changed what you meant, if I'm wrong, fair enough. No attempt to score points here. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 12:44 - Sep 21 with 54 views | AlpineBlue |
| Anyone giving serious critical analysis to that should give their head a wobble on 10:44 - Sep 21 by FrimleyBlue |
Haha good point harbz.
Just meant rather than trying to pass the ball around the. Backline. Having the ball played forward alot more into midfield or out wide rather than our slow build up play.
So not quite long. Just not so short. If that actually makes sense. |
Basically like when O'Shea put Hirst through? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
