| McKenna to Celtic 15:33 - Oct 29 with 901 views | Uncle_Bulgaria | Can't see it happening in a million years Underwhelming appointment for a shithouse club that think they're Bayern Munich/Barca/Real Madrid They won't pay his release fee Hasn't won anything.....despite impressive promotions Ange is free, available, has history with the club, won loads of trophies, probably his level, easy hire Why would you go for McKenna??! * Waiting for this to come and bite me on the arse over the next few days/weeks |  | | |  |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:17 - Oct 29 with 731 views | darkhorse28 | They might want a longer term legacy appointment, that would be the only thing in his favour, he could potentially do the role beyond Desmond’s time at the club…, owners and egos .., his legacy. He’s paid a reported £5 million, which I don’t think is quite true, but he is paid an OBSCENE amount based on results. Slot is paid £6 million. Very few managers in the world paid more than McKenna. In the context of that.., considering the last 18 have contained wins you can count on one hand, hundreds of millions spent, mid table in the championship…., we should bite their hands off.., and likely would. Sadly though. That leaves us with the real problem.., Mark Ashton and no ownership oversight at all. We can progress without McKenna .., easily.., there are way better managers in the here in now. Costing far far less. BUT we likely won’t do that with Ashton ., he’s 35 years what he is, a decent EFL operator and that’s it. With owners that don’t provide the structure around that, who is or isn’t manager doesn’t really matter. If we are to be a success, it will have to be an individual that does it all.., and Ashton won’t allow that. His EGO needs the control.., and when you aren’t good enough .., that’s a problem. ASHTON HAS TO GO. We can’t move forward until he does.., and we need ownership oversight, checks and agency too. We’ve fallen way behind where we should be based on our last 18 months resources. |  | |  |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:19 - Oct 29 with 709 views | Keno |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:17 - Oct 29 by darkhorse28 | They might want a longer term legacy appointment, that would be the only thing in his favour, he could potentially do the role beyond Desmond’s time at the club…, owners and egos .., his legacy. He’s paid a reported £5 million, which I don’t think is quite true, but he is paid an OBSCENE amount based on results. Slot is paid £6 million. Very few managers in the world paid more than McKenna. In the context of that.., considering the last 18 have contained wins you can count on one hand, hundreds of millions spent, mid table in the championship…., we should bite their hands off.., and likely would. Sadly though. That leaves us with the real problem.., Mark Ashton and no ownership oversight at all. We can progress without McKenna .., easily.., there are way better managers in the here in now. Costing far far less. BUT we likely won’t do that with Ashton ., he’s 35 years what he is, a decent EFL operator and that’s it. With owners that don’t provide the structure around that, who is or isn’t manager doesn’t really matter. If we are to be a success, it will have to be an individual that does it all.., and Ashton won’t allow that. His EGO needs the control.., and when you aren’t good enough .., that’s a problem. ASHTON HAS TO GO. We can’t move forward until he does.., and we need ownership oversight, checks and agency too. We’ve fallen way behind where we should be based on our last 18 months resources. |
So Darky what’s your favourite cheese? |  |
|  |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:20 - Oct 29 with 693 views | jpemb | The usual dross from Darkhorse then [Post edited 29 Oct 16:20]
|  | |  |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:22 - Oct 29 with 678 views | FrimleyBlue |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:19 - Oct 29 by Keno | So Darky what’s your favourite cheese? |
Their mask has slipped " count number of wins on one hand" so how many fingers do they have on one hand....................... |  |
|  |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:25 - Oct 29 with 650 views | Uncle_Bulgaria |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:20 - Oct 29 by jpemb | The usual dross from Darkhorse then [Post edited 29 Oct 16:20]
|
Yh that wasn't really the point of the original post! Not anti-McKenna/Ashton etc, just (hopefully) a realistic assessment of whether KM will go or not For the record, I want KM to stay ..... for a very long time |  | |  |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:46 - Oct 29 with 557 views | BlueBadger |
| McKenna to Celtic on 16:17 - Oct 29 by darkhorse28 | They might want a longer term legacy appointment, that would be the only thing in his favour, he could potentially do the role beyond Desmond’s time at the club…, owners and egos .., his legacy. He’s paid a reported £5 million, which I don’t think is quite true, but he is paid an OBSCENE amount based on results. Slot is paid £6 million. Very few managers in the world paid more than McKenna. In the context of that.., considering the last 18 have contained wins you can count on one hand, hundreds of millions spent, mid table in the championship…., we should bite their hands off.., and likely would. Sadly though. That leaves us with the real problem.., Mark Ashton and no ownership oversight at all. We can progress without McKenna .., easily.., there are way better managers in the here in now. Costing far far less. BUT we likely won’t do that with Ashton ., he’s 35 years what he is, a decent EFL operator and that’s it. With owners that don’t provide the structure around that, who is or isn’t manager doesn’t really matter. If we are to be a success, it will have to be an individual that does it all.., and Ashton won’t allow that. His EGO needs the control.., and when you aren’t good enough .., that’s a problem. ASHTON HAS TO GO. We can’t move forward until he does.., and we need ownership oversight, checks and agency too. We’ve fallen way behind where we should be based on our last 18 months resources. |
Shouldn't you be off writing on tennis balls rather than pretending you support Town? |  |
|  |
| |