| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… 22:37 - Nov 28 with 546 views | Reuser_is_God |
…are we?
I think it’s more the case that McKenna doesn’t know his best 11.
& I don’t particularly blame him for that, there has been a lot of change in the squad & also not enough of them have performed to a level to nail down their place in the team.
|  |
| |  |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:40 - Nov 28 with 501 views | MillsTash |
Six
Seven |  | | |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:41 - Nov 28 with 477 views | Bluecasp |
Think its more that Mckenna doesn't want to upset players. |  | | |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:45 - Nov 28 with 459 views | Illinoisblue |
We have a good squad at this level but this team rarely clicks in a convincing manner. We’re crying out for some drive and creativity. |  |
| |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:51 - Nov 28 with 417 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:45 - Nov 28 by Illinoisblue |
We have a good squad at this level but this team rarely clicks in a convincing manner. We’re crying out for some drive and creativity. |
We do the same things over and over and over again.
Only a few games ago we scored twice at QPR by going outside the man on the right hand side and whipping in the cross. Why have we not seen it since? |  |
| |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:53 - Nov 28 with 399 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:45 - Nov 28 by Illinoisblue |
We have a good squad at this level but this team rarely clicks in a convincing manner. We’re crying out for some drive and creativity. |
And cohesion |  | | |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:54 - Nov 28 with 382 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:51 - Nov 28 by gainsboroughblue |
We do the same things over and over and over again.
Only a few games ago we scored twice at QPR by going outside the man on the right hand side and whipping in the cross. Why have we not seen it since? |
Better to cut inside into traffic | | | |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:54 - Nov 28 with 384 views | Guillermo_Edwards |
I wonder if literally has in his head an away side and a home side, adjusted occasionally to the opposition's strengths and weaknesses. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Negative = longer time to find that click, positives = incredible options on the bench and like for like potential when we lose players to injury amid the heavy fixture strain | | | |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:55 - Nov 28 with 376 views | Pompous_Blue |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:45 - Nov 28 by Illinoisblue |
We have a good squad at this level but this team rarely clicks in a convincing manner. We’re crying out for some drive and creativity. |
The team doesn’t get the chance to click and gel!!
As I have said before, we improved in league one and the following championship season when he stopped tinkering with the team so much!! |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 22:56 - Nov 28 with 360 views | Mat |
Doesn’t really matter though does it - whoever he brings in for whoever is always 6/10 🤷♂️ | | | |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 23:06 - Nov 28 with 313 views | LankHenners |
We'll probably get a clearer answer on that once we're through December but you're right you'd like to think there'd have been more players making themselves close to undroppable by this stage.
One thing I don't really get though to be honest is switching Greaves and Kipre every other game. Some people bizarrely don't want to believe it but Greaves is the better on the ball and is genuinely quite good at joining the attack, where we've seen his 'overlapping CB' move cause an extra problem and confusion to a stubborn backline who have been comfortable watching us faff around in front of them all game.
IMO should just be playing him most the time and only bring Kipre in if the opposition have a particularly big bastard up top who likes to throw his elbows about as he seems to be better at dealing with that type of player. |  |
| |
| Not really seeing the benefit of 6 or 7 changes to the starting 11 every week… on 23:10 - Nov 28 with 300 views | FrimleyBlue |
Give this a run for 4 games
Walton
Furlong
Oshea
Greaves
Davis
Azor
Nunez
Taylor
Azon
Egeli
Akpom
Azon has played on left of front 3
Akpom can rotate with egeli in the other two
Azon can then work with davis being out wide
Midfield 3 gives us steel and creativity [Post edited 28 Nov 23:12]
|  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
