Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Palestine Action 18:24 - Feb 4 with 448 viewsDJR

https://www.theguardian.com/uk

"Palestine Action activists cleared of aggravated burglary at Israeli defence firm site

None of the six activists were convicted of any offence over break-in at Elbit Systems factory near Bristol in 2024"

A couple of observations.

1. No wonder they want to get rid of jury trials.

2. Defend Our Juries said the verdicts were “a huge blow to government ministers” who had “tried to portray Palestine Action as a violent group to justify banning it under badly drafted terrorism legislation”. Amnesty International also said it showed how disproportionate the proscription decision was.
[Post edited 4 Feb 18:25]
3
Palestine Action on 18:29 - Feb 4 with 432 viewsZx1988

The judge obviously didn't direct them hard enough.

Obviously we don't know the reasoning for the jury's decisions, but it might seem to suggest that they were somewhat sympathetic to the cause?

On a similar note, do we know if any of the arrests for support of Palestine Action have ever ended up before a jury? I'd be very interested to see how things pan out in those circumstances.

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

0
Palestine Action on 19:30 - Feb 4 with 323 viewsearlsgreenblue

Watching the video of the police woman being struck & suffering a spine fracture as was reported & all the damage caused, whatever & whoever the business was owned by, surely the English laws cannot condone this & allow a jury to let these people off with no consequences………..sending a signal to others that this is acceptable?
3
Palestine Action on 21:37 - Feb 4 with 221 viewsDJR

Palestine Action on 19:30 - Feb 4 by earlsgreenblue

Watching the video of the police woman being struck & suffering a spine fracture as was reported & all the damage caused, whatever & whoever the business was owned by, surely the English laws cannot condone this & allow a jury to let these people off with no consequences………..sending a signal to others that this is acceptable?


So you support the proposed abolition of jury trials?
0
Palestine Action on 21:38 - Feb 4 with 215 viewsthebooks

Palestine Action on 21:37 - Feb 4 by DJR

So you support the proposed abolition of jury trials?


Only when they disagree with the verdict :-)
0
Palestine Action on 21:43 - Feb 4 with 196 viewsGlasgowBlue

A British jury could not agree that this attack on a female police officer that broke her spine was Grievous Bodily Harm. Sgt Kate Evans was off work for 3 months and couldn’t shower or get into bed unassisted.



Stop the world I want to get off.
[Post edited 4 Feb 21:45]

FREE IRAN FROM THE MULLAHS - FREE PALESTINE FROM HAMAS - FREE LEBANON FROM HEZBOLLAH
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

3
Palestine Action on 22:14 - Feb 4 with 136 viewsPendejo

Palestine Action on 21:37 - Feb 4 by DJR

So you support the proposed abolition of jury trials?


As it happens I do, but only where specialist knowledge required, principally complex fraud cases and anything else where "the man on the Clapham" can not be expected to understand

Whereas that photo alone is terrifying, am yet to read the article, so maybe it was "self defence"....

uberima fides
Poll: Who will Charlie Austin play for next season?

0
Palestine Action on 22:29 - Feb 4 with 92 viewsZx1988

Interesting to read in the article that the defence KC reminded the jury of their absolute right to acquit with, seemingly, no adverse comment from the judge.

A far cry from the case I flagged up the other week, where the judge all but threatened the jury with criminal prosecution if they so much as considered a conscience-based verdict.

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

1
Palestine Action on 23:40 - Feb 4 with 16 viewsbournemouthblue

Palestine Action on 19:30 - Feb 4 by earlsgreenblue

Watching the video of the police woman being struck & suffering a spine fracture as was reported & all the damage caused, whatever & whoever the business was owned by, surely the English laws cannot condone this & allow a jury to let these people off with no consequences………..sending a signal to others that this is acceptable?


I can't get my head around how they have got off these charges, who the feck is their lawyer?

Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll: How much for Omari

1
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026