| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) 11:02 - Mar 5 with 2249 views | itfcsuth | From next season. Utter nonsense. [Post edited 5 Mar 11:02]
|  | | |  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:28 - Mar 5 with 404 views | SuperKieranMcKenna | Football is slowly eating itself from greed. Expensive tickets, PL full of tourist fans, stupid kick off times, tedious VAR, and now this. After COVID attendances rose, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that tails off. Trouble is they don’t need us fans for the revenue any more with all the rights sold abroad. |  | |  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:32 - Mar 5 with 391 views | vapour_trail | I don’t mind it. For those of us old enough to recall the introduction of play offs, this very much echoes the reaction to that as a concept. It’s worked ok in the conference for a little while. |  |
|  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:33 - Mar 5 with 390 views | Chris_ITFC | Ironically, it doesn’t remove dead rubbers all that much, as teams will be ‘safe’ in the playoff places a lot sooner. Just a weird scramble for 8th(!) place. |  |
|  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:35 - Mar 5 with 384 views | Vaughan8 |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:32 - Mar 5 by vapour_trail | I don’t mind it. For those of us old enough to recall the introduction of play offs, this very much echoes the reaction to that as a concept. It’s worked ok in the conference for a little while. |
Unfortunately it isn't the same as the National League. If they had that system it would make more sense. The 3rd and 4th Teams get a decent advantage. a 2 legged semi final makes it pretty much the same as before but you COULD get 7th or 8th instead of 5th and 6th. Seems a pointless step to me. |  | |  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:36 - Mar 5 with 382 views | Illinoisblue |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:28 - Mar 5 by SuperKieranMcKenna | Football is slowly eating itself from greed. Expensive tickets, PL full of tourist fans, stupid kick off times, tedious VAR, and now this. After COVID attendances rose, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that tails off. Trouble is they don’t need us fans for the revenue any more with all the rights sold abroad. |
Add to all of that; Arsenal’s anti-football, ridiculous scrums at every set piece, and, of more concern, fans crying about “corruption” at every ref or VAR controversy. The game is stuck in a misery loop. |  |
|  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:40 - Mar 5 with 359 views | JammyDodgerrr | Crazy this got approved and through before they fixed the National League promotion issues. Self-serving at it's best. |  |
|  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 15:14 - Mar 5 with 291 views | Mark |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 13:28 - Mar 5 by SuperKieranMcKenna | Football is slowly eating itself from greed. Expensive tickets, PL full of tourist fans, stupid kick off times, tedious VAR, and now this. After COVID attendances rose, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that tails off. Trouble is they don’t need us fans for the revenue any more with all the rights sold abroad. |
TV income could tail off though if fans get bored. It isn't a lot of fun watching players standing around waiting for VAR decisions. Expanding the play-offs could lead to less interest in the Championship matches as fans may prefer to wait for the play-off games rather than see so many league matches. |  | |  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 16:32 - Mar 5 with 261 views | Maccaisgod | Utter boll*cks. Another shite idea based on money. Wan*ers. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 17:49 - Mar 5 with 220 views | bournemouthblue | How many team voted against it? |  |
|  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 18:02 - Mar 5 with 204 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 17:49 - Mar 5 by bournemouthblue | How many team voted against it? |
Apparently a majority vote was needed but the vote included ALL EFL clubs, not just Championship clubs. You'd imagine all L1 clubs voting for it, not unusual for a L1 club to come up and get into 8th. |  |
|  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 18:06 - Mar 5 with 197 views | nshearman1 |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 18:02 - Mar 5 by Cheltenham_Blue | Apparently a majority vote was needed but the vote included ALL EFL clubs, not just Championship clubs. You'd imagine all L1 clubs voting for it, not unusual for a L1 club to come up and get into 8th. |
I wonder how Town voted. If this was done with the correct level of open-ness they should release details of who voted for and against. |  | |  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 18:20 - Mar 5 with 176 views | vapour_trail |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 18:02 - Mar 5 by Cheltenham_Blue | Apparently a majority vote was needed but the vote included ALL EFL clubs, not just Championship clubs. You'd imagine all L1 clubs voting for it, not unusual for a L1 club to come up and get into 8th. |
Is it not also being applied in leagues 1 and 2? |  |
|  |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 18:50 - Mar 5 with 140 views | Mark |
| Play offs to 6 teams (n/t) on 18:06 - Mar 5 by nshearman1 | I wonder how Town voted. If this was done with the correct level of open-ness they should release details of who voted for and against. |
I wonder. I would have hoped they would consult with fans before voting. |  | |  |
| |