| Cunha got less of a ban than this 16:42 - Mar 13 with 1178 views | JackSted | Just saying... |  |
| |  |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 17:08 - Mar 13 with 1084 views | Blue_Heath | Fair point, forgot about that. |  |
|  |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 20:27 - Mar 13 with 888 views | EsherBlueStu | Wow good point. What a stitch up |  | |  |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 20:47 - Mar 13 with 835 views | vapour_trail | Has Leif bought anyone glasses and written a letter of apology though? |  |
|  |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 21:00 - Mar 13 with 789 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 20:47 - Mar 13 by vapour_trail | Has Leif bought anyone glasses and written a letter of apology though? |
That's the issue then. If Leif had written a crayon apology and said he was going to pay for the player to get a haircut he would have got just one game. To be fair on Cunha, he did also point out that it was totally out of character because he had only done similar a few times before and he would probably leave it a few weeks before doing it again. |  |
|  |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 23:00 - Mar 13 with 600 views | bournemouthblue | The reducing of the Cunha ban was scandalous as later proved when he had issues in later games We really should have learnt from this, Leif buying the player flowers etc |  |
|  |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 00:09 - Mar 14 with 514 views | redrickstuhaart | A very good point well made. A deliberate elbow to the back of the head, of a non player, follwoed by an assault. As opposed to a minor push. Something is, frankly, bent. |  |
|  |
| Cunha got less of a ban than this on 11:41 - Mar 14 with 167 views | Ryorry | Came on here to make that very point! Well said. |  |
|  |
| |