| Another angle 19:33 - Mar 13 with 1659 views | PhilTWTD |
Lots going on in the box, so difficult to see why Leif gets singled out.
|  | | |  |
| Another angle on 19:40 - Mar 13 with 1532 views | Exiled2Surrey |
As I said earlier, he has gone through Thomas (who melts - one of the least impressive performers I have ever seen, until the free kick) to get to where the ball is landing with his eyes fixed on the ball - he is competing for the ball, and keeping the other player away - but show me where he actually looks at the other player. It looks so harsh.
Dare I say that was a fall that would not be uncommon in the Italian leagues… |  | | |
| Another angle on 19:42 - Mar 13 with 1471 views | Illinoisblue |
Watched it numerous times and can’t see what warrants a 3-game ban. Outrageous. And of course those spineless sniveling c***s at the FA will release their findings in “due course” because why wouldn’t they do that on the same day as they unfairly ban a player.
Pitchforks at the ready, people. |  |
| |
| Another angle on 19:51 - Mar 13 with 1386 views | runaround |
There is just no evidence for them to have come to this conclusion
It stinks |  | | |
| Another angle on 19:54 - Mar 13 with 1341 views | Swansea_Blue |
“Azon is in a headlock”.
Yep, literally. Says it all really. The grappling at set pieces makes a nonsense of decisions that are given in the box in open play. The refs did start to clamp down on it a few years back didn’t they? That seemed to last a few months before people complained that they were giving penalties lol |  |
| |
| Another angle on 19:56 - Mar 13 with 1331 views | HungryLikeTheWoolf |
Glad there was someone on the sidelines instructing these professional footballers to get it away, they would have had no idea what to do otherwise |  |
| |
| Another angle on 21:01 - Mar 13 with 1050 views | 2-5-7 |
What version of video footage are the FA using to determine the incident.
None of the ones I have seen would get a detention let alone a harsher punishment.
It really doesn't make sense as it is so unclear.
Plus the Stoke player kicks out.
Actually bizarre. |  | | |
| Another angle on 21:27 - Mar 13 with 926 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Two things strike me.
1 Azon stayed on his feet when he would often have thrown himself over in their area a while ago.
2 If the ref had seen Davis' shove at the time, it would have been a penalty.
It looks very harsh that retrospective action has singled out Davis and taken no account of the kick from the Leicester player but Davis must realise he cannot react like that. I am guessing the alleged hair pull came before the fall and isn't visible on any of the angles I have seen so far. Is it possible Davis accepted violent conduct for the shove and the panel thought he had accepted it for the alleged hair pull. I would hope the submissions would have been clear but that might explain it. |  |
| |
| Another angle on 21:32 - Mar 13 with 888 views | DJR |
Concerning the grappling that goes on at corners, why don't they introduce a rule that players must keep their hands by their sides unless actually challenging for the ball, when the use of hands can give a player a bit of extra height and impetus?
Anyone who fails to do that should be booked, which if followed through I am sure would change the sort of behaviour that I just don't think went on years ago. [Post edited 13 Mar 21:34]
|  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Another angle on 22:04 - Mar 13 with 765 views | Wallingford_Boy |
You can’t raise your arms in the modern game ffs.
It’s not rocket science! |  |
| |
| Another angle on 22:48 - Mar 13 with 602 views | ReusersTown |
| Another angle on 22:04 - Mar 13 by Wallingford_Boy |
You can’t raise your arms in the modern game ffs.
It’s not rocket science! |
But you can kick out at people then? How long has that been the case in your infinite wisdom? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
