| And today, Zack will be……. 09:03 - May 11 with 9073 views | GlasgowBlue | His life is like an episode of Mr Benn |  |
| |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 08:46 - May 12 with 952 views | grow_our_own |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 08:26 - May 12 by NthQldITFC | I take it you accept that there's a massive ethical imperative to rebalance the taxation system - both personal and corporate - to address poverty, inequality, and the collapse of national infrastructure, just not Polanski's way? |
I also want it to be Christmas every day. You can't dream enough tax revenue into existence. Fact is, we aren't a rich country. We're below the EU average, just above Slovenia https://tradingeconomics.com/c This is real wealth: per capita. The hard-left keeps wanging-on that we're "sixth biggest economy in the world", but the pie is actually quite small relative to the quantity of mouths feeding from it. It all starts with higher growth and productivity. The hard-left have little to say on that. [Post edited 12 May 9:10]
|  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 08:49 - May 12 with 932 views | NthQldITFC |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 08:46 - May 12 by grow_our_own | I also want it to be Christmas every day. You can't dream enough tax revenue into existence. Fact is, we aren't a rich country. We're below the EU average, just above Slovenia https://tradingeconomics.com/c This is real wealth: per capita. The hard-left keeps wanging-on that we're "sixth biggest economy in the world", but the pie is actually quite small relative to the quantity of mouths feeding from it. It all starts with higher growth and productivity. The hard-left have little to say on that. [Post edited 12 May 9:10]
|
The key word in my post is "rebalance". |  |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:06 - May 12 with 864 views | grow_our_own |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 08:35 - May 12 by The_Flashing_Smile | Just playing devil's avocado here, but surely it's not beyond the realms of possibility that he did make an unintentional mistake due to his very unique living circumstances? Also, why would you be against taxing the rich more... unless you're one of them? Is it necessarily "populism" to want a fairer tax system? Again, just playing devil's advocate because these things tend to turn out to be not as cut and dried as they first seem and I'd like to know more detail before making my decision. |
"why would you be against taxing the rich more... unless you're one of them" - I'm not against taxing the rich. How do you propose to go about it? Wealth tax? Pretty much no other country has them because they know their rich will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy. Only wealth tax that can ever work is land tax, which I'm in favour of instead of the current council tax. Can't move land to Dubai. The Green Party's absolute percent tax on wealth (% on assets over £xx million) will never be collected in anything like the quantity it is budgeting. It's fantasy populism. It's purpose is only to fool the electorate into empowering grifters. The bond market know this and will f#ck your mortgage if ever the Greens or their policies come to power. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:11 - May 12 with 842 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 08:49 - May 12 by NthQldITFC | The key word in my post is "rebalance". |
We could start with our MP’s paying their fair share - their income puts them in the top 1pc, and yet seemingly so many of them (of all colours) struggle to understand their own tax legislation - despite having access to a whole host of advisors, and the disposable income to pay for a semi competent accountant. The frequency of which they fall fouls leads to suspicions that it’s no accident. As for their NI plans, whilst I agree we need to raise more for the NHS, it will just hit a small section of middle earners on PAYE. The rich aren’t taking a salary, and the self employed will continue to pay a lower rate and enjoy the same services. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:12 - May 12 with 841 views | DJR |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:06 - May 12 by grow_our_own | "why would you be against taxing the rich more... unless you're one of them" - I'm not against taxing the rich. How do you propose to go about it? Wealth tax? Pretty much no other country has them because they know their rich will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy. Only wealth tax that can ever work is land tax, which I'm in favour of instead of the current council tax. Can't move land to Dubai. The Green Party's absolute percent tax on wealth (% on assets over £xx million) will never be collected in anything like the quantity it is budgeting. It's fantasy populism. It's purpose is only to fool the electorate into empowering grifters. The bond market know this and will f#ck your mortgage if ever the Greens or their policies come to power. |
Relax. The Greens are never going to be the main party of government. At best, in a hung parliament, they might be able to get one or two of their policies enacted, but that ain't going to be a wealth tax. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:17 - May 12 with 815 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:06 - May 12 by grow_our_own | "why would you be against taxing the rich more... unless you're one of them" - I'm not against taxing the rich. How do you propose to go about it? Wealth tax? Pretty much no other country has them because they know their rich will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy. Only wealth tax that can ever work is land tax, which I'm in favour of instead of the current council tax. Can't move land to Dubai. The Green Party's absolute percent tax on wealth (% on assets over £xx million) will never be collected in anything like the quantity it is budgeting. It's fantasy populism. It's purpose is only to fool the electorate into empowering grifters. The bond market know this and will f#ck your mortgage if ever the Greens or their policies come to power. |
A lot of the rich just draw their income from property and dividends rhough - if we lost a few property owners and Russian oligarchs to Dubai that’s not really going to impact the economy. The main criticism is the fanciful claims by the Greens how much it would actually raise. I’m not sure I buy the ‘they’ll all leave’, Norway has more billionaires per capita than the UK and is hardly a tax haven. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:21 - May 12 with 779 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:06 - May 12 by grow_our_own | "why would you be against taxing the rich more... unless you're one of them" - I'm not against taxing the rich. How do you propose to go about it? Wealth tax? Pretty much no other country has them because they know their rich will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy. Only wealth tax that can ever work is land tax, which I'm in favour of instead of the current council tax. Can't move land to Dubai. The Green Party's absolute percent tax on wealth (% on assets over £xx million) will never be collected in anything like the quantity it is budgeting. It's fantasy populism. It's purpose is only to fool the electorate into empowering grifters. The bond market know this and will f#ck your mortgage if ever the Greens or their policies come to power. |
When you say "Pretty much no other country has them"... "pretty much" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Switzerland, Norway, Spain and Colombia apparently have a successful wealth tax, and the idea that the rich swan off to Dubai has been seen to be hugely exaggerated. A wealth tax can work if it's implimented properly. |  |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:28 - May 12 with 749 views | bartyg |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:11 - May 12 by SuperKieranMcKenna | We could start with our MP’s paying their fair share - their income puts them in the top 1pc, and yet seemingly so many of them (of all colours) struggle to understand their own tax legislation - despite having access to a whole host of advisors, and the disposable income to pay for a semi competent accountant. The frequency of which they fall fouls leads to suspicions that it’s no accident. As for their NI plans, whilst I agree we need to raise more for the NHS, it will just hit a small section of middle earners on PAYE. The rich aren’t taking a salary, and the self employed will continue to pay a lower rate and enjoy the same services. |
Worth a reminder that Polanski is not a sitting MP. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:31 - May 12 with 733 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:28 - May 12 by bartyg | Worth a reminder that Polanski is not a sitting MP. |
He’s still a politician is he not, and a Leader of a party supposedly championing better services. Worth a reminder the Greens now admitted to him failing to pay it for 3 years. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:31 - May 12 with 732 views | bartyg |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:06 - May 12 by grow_our_own | "why would you be against taxing the rich more... unless you're one of them" - I'm not against taxing the rich. How do you propose to go about it? Wealth tax? Pretty much no other country has them because they know their rich will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy. Only wealth tax that can ever work is land tax, which I'm in favour of instead of the current council tax. Can't move land to Dubai. The Green Party's absolute percent tax on wealth (% on assets over £xx million) will never be collected in anything like the quantity it is budgeting. It's fantasy populism. It's purpose is only to fool the electorate into empowering grifters. The bond market know this and will f#ck your mortgage if ever the Greens or their policies come to power. |
Sorry, but I did laugh out loud at "will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy" If anyone's living in a fantasy it's you in your absolute meritocracy. |  |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:37 - May 12 with 707 views | grow_our_own | This is a football forum, and I'm a busy man. "They'll all swan off to Dubai" is my shortcut to exemplify that the tax-gap will be huge, and wealth taxes will raise very little revenue. They'll definitely raise very little if people "forget" to pay them like Zack Polanski. [Post edited 12 May 9:37]
|  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:40 - May 12 with 678 views | lowhouseblue |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:21 - May 12 by The_Flashing_Smile | When you say "Pretty much no other country has them"... "pretty much" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Switzerland, Norway, Spain and Colombia apparently have a successful wealth tax, and the idea that the rich swan off to Dubai has been seen to be hugely exaggerated. A wealth tax can work if it's implimented properly. |
those 3 european countries raise very little via wealth taxes - Switzerland 4.3% of total tax revenue, Spain 0.6%, and Norway 1.5%. for comparison income tax in the uk raises 28%. you also need to look at the tax regime in full - there are things those other countries don't otherwise tax (particularly the swiss system). in the uk capital taxes already amount to 4% of tax revenue. also norway's wealth tax kicks in at net assets of £125,000. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:42 - May 12 with 663 views | underspaces | Complete non-story. Stated that he was working 'at' the Ministry of Justice in a tweet in 2020. He was working for an agency at the time that was contracted by various organisations. Nothing he said is a lie. The media is really out to try and get him at the moment, and important you see through what is a a story grounded in evidence, and what is a blatant smear campaign. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:45 - May 12 with 644 views | grow_our_own |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:31 - May 12 by bartyg | Sorry, but I did laugh out loud at "will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy" If anyone's living in a fantasy it's you in your absolute meritocracy. |
"absolute meritocracy" - it's an average. Not all money is old money. Much is in the hands of the deserving: those who've worked hard, are talented, and who contribute significantly to the economy. I'm in favour of land tax and inheritance tax. I'm just not pulling a % of total wealth out of my arse and expecting anywhere near that to be received by HMRC like the Greens do. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:48 - May 12 with 630 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:42 - May 12 by underspaces | Complete non-story. Stated that he was working 'at' the Ministry of Justice in a tweet in 2020. He was working for an agency at the time that was contracted by various organisations. Nothing he said is a lie. The media is really out to try and get him at the moment, and important you see through what is a a story grounded in evidence, and what is a blatant smear campaign. |
Fair play - I’ll stop paying my council tax, and when they come after me I’ll just say it’s a smear campaign. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:56 - May 12 with 574 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:45 - May 12 by grow_our_own | "absolute meritocracy" - it's an average. Not all money is old money. Much is in the hands of the deserving: those who've worked hard, are talented, and who contribute significantly to the economy. I'm in favour of land tax and inheritance tax. I'm just not pulling a % of total wealth out of my arse and expecting anywhere near that to be received by HMRC like the Greens do. |
You never did answer if you're one of these so-called rich. Just wondering if you have any bias here? |  |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:58 - May 12 with 568 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:48 - May 12 by SuperKieranMcKenna | Fair play - I’ll stop paying my council tax, and when they come after me I’ll just say it’s a smear campaign. |
That's a funny reply to be fair to you. But that's not what Polanski has done, he's paid the full amount when the mistake was highlighted. |  |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 10:01 - May 12 with 563 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:58 - May 12 by The_Flashing_Smile | That's a funny reply to be fair to you. But that's not what Polanski has done, he's paid the full amount when the mistake was highlighted. |
They always do when they get caught - it’s not like they have a choice. If I was going to opt out of paying, I’d want to make damn sure I was eligible to do so. So he’s either not very bright, or not very honest. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 10:02 - May 12 with 541 views | lowhouseblue |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:58 - May 12 by The_Flashing_Smile | That's a funny reply to be fair to you. But that's not what Polanski has done, he's paid the full amount when the mistake was highlighted. |
what was his alternative? |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 10:08 - May 12 with 505 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 10:02 - May 12 by lowhouseblue | what was his alternative? |
I didn't say there was an alternative. I was replying to someone's humorous comment of "when they come after me I’ll just say it’s a smear campaign." The point being, Polanski hasn't bleated about a smear campaign ...but there clearly is one going on, digging for stuff and then drip feeding it into the media like they did with Corbyn. |  |
|  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 10:13 - May 12 with 474 views | leitrimblue |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:31 - May 12 by bartyg | Sorry, but I did laugh out loud at "will swan-off to Dubai, taking their skills and productivity out of the economy" If anyone's living in a fantasy it's you in your absolute meritocracy. |
What about a 50% wealth tax on anyone 'swanning off to Dubai'? |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 10:40 - May 12 with 377 views | grow_our_own |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 09:56 - May 12 by The_Flashing_Smile | You never did answer if you're one of these so-called rich. Just wondering if you have any bias here? |
No, I'm not rich. Not really the point. The point is: Polanski's tax policies are from planet Zog, and he neglects to pay tax himself. Labour are teetering on the brink of chaos because so many people have fallen for his BS. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 11:43 - May 12 with 299 views | grow_our_own |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 10:08 - May 12 by The_Flashing_Smile | I didn't say there was an alternative. I was replying to someone's humorous comment of "when they come after me I’ll just say it’s a smear campaign." The point being, Polanski hasn't bleated about a smear campaign ...but there clearly is one going on, digging for stuff and then drip feeding it into the media like they did with Corbyn. |
Saying Zack Polanski neglected to pay his taxes isn't a smear. Telling the truth isn't a smear. It's extremely relevant information about someone who calls for higher tax. Especially someone who calls for taxes that, in reality, people won't actually pay (just like him). Yet he plans spending as if they will. |  | |  |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 12:31 - May 12 with 217 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| And today, Zack will be……. on 11:43 - May 12 by grow_our_own | Saying Zack Polanski neglected to pay his taxes isn't a smear. Telling the truth isn't a smear. It's extremely relevant information about someone who calls for higher tax. Especially someone who calls for taxes that, in reality, people won't actually pay (just like him). Yet he plans spending as if they will. |
I wasn't just referring to the tax story. That question is legitimate to be asked. I'm talking about the drip feed we're getting now of several stories, some more flimsy than others. The fact that I used the phrase "drip feed" should've been a clue I wasn't talking about one thing. |  |
|  |
| |