| Thats a shocking decision 22:32 - Jun 23 with 1899 views | redrickstuhaart |
Clearly a Ghana FK, Pickford clearly faking, and a serious decision for a ref to make over goalscoring opportunities. |  |
| |  |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:35 - Jun 23 with 1635 views | LeoMuff |
Looked like he just ran into Pickford looking for it for me. |  |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:36 - Jun 23 with 1613 views | Illinoisblue |
On replay, clear foul by Ghana player; leads with leg on Pickford. |  |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:43 - Jun 23 with 1542 views | surreyblue |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:36 - Jun 23 by Illinoisblue |
On replay, clear foul by Ghana player; leads with leg on Pickford. |
That was my take too. If the Ghanaian just lets pickford hit him it's a definite yellow and a potential red | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:44 - Jun 23 with 1528 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:43 - Jun 23 by surreyblue |
That was my take too. If the Ghanaian just lets pickford hit him it's a definite yellow and a potential red |
That makes no sense at all.
Pickford came, got nowhere near the ball and took out a striker. | |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:53 - Jun 23 with 1467 views | surreyblue |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:44 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
That makes no sense at all.
Pickford came, got nowhere near the ball and took out a striker. |
The striker lead with his studs and the first contact was the bottom of his foot against Pickford's shin | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:54 - Jun 23 with 1460 views | StNeotsBlue |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:44 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
That makes no sense at all.
Pickford came, got nowhere near the ball and took out a striker. |
No he didn't. The Ghanaian striker made no attempt to win the ball. |  | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:56 - Jun 23 with 1433 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:54 - Jun 23 by StNeotsBlue |
No he didn't. The Ghanaian striker made no attempt to win the ball. |
The bloke is running. Where is his foot supposed to go? | |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:01 - Jun 23 with 1396 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:56 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
The bloke is running. Where is his foot supposed to go? |
Perhaps more importantly...
at about 79 minutes, how is that not a pen and a red by Konsa?
Clear as day unless I missed a flag for something else? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:02 - Jun 23 with 1390 views | LeoMuff |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:56 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
The bloke is running. Where is his foot supposed to go? |
On the floor ? Not the keepers leg ? | |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:03 - Jun 23 with 1360 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:02 - Jun 23 by LeoMuff |
On the floor ? Not the keepers leg ? |
If the keeper is not there, he lands on teh floor, and gets through to the loose ball.
But 79 minutes.... clear as day unless something else going on? | |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:16 - Jun 23 with 1248 views | Suffolktractor |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:03 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
If the keeper is not there, he lands on teh floor, and gets through to the loose ball.
But 79 minutes.... clear as day unless something else going on? |
Amazed that wasn’t given as a penalty. Clear foul, no where near the ball, yet commentators etc hardly mentioned it. Had that been at other end with Kane through on goal I think we would have got that. | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:17 - Jun 23 with 1239 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:16 - Jun 23 by Suffolktractor |
Amazed that wasn’t given as a penalty. Clear foul, no where near the ball, yet commentators etc hardly mentioned it. Had that been at other end with Kane through on goal I think we would have got that. |
Thats what Im baffled about. Seems to have been glossed over. Clear as day unless some other flag or decision that the commentary did not make clear?
Shearer praised the Konsa challenge ffs! | |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:19 - Jun 23 with 1207 views | Suffolktractor |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:17 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
Thats what Im baffled about. Seems to have been glossed over. Clear as day unless some other flag or decision that the commentary did not make clear?
Shearer praised the Konsa challenge ffs! |
Offside was given after the event once he got a shot away and it hit Semenyo.
Just so strange there was no reaction. | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:19 - Jun 23 with 1207 views | StNeotsBlue |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:03 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
If the keeper is not there, he lands on teh floor, and gets through to the loose ball.
But 79 minutes.... clear as day unless something else going on? |
That doesn't make any sense, the keeper being in the way doesn't make it a foul.
Agree they should have bad a penalty later but no idea what you're trying to insinuate with your last comment. | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:20 - Jun 23 with 1200 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:19 - Jun 23 by StNeotsBlue |
That doesn't make any sense, the keeper being in the way doesn't make it a foul.
Agree they should have bad a penalty later but no idea what you're trying to insinuate with your last comment. |
It does if you stop the player getting to the ball. Having looked again- I see why people say the Ghana player stuck a leg out. But its pretty clear he turned his side on to protect himself as Pickford blocked his path. Its a red card all day. [Post edited 23 Jun 23:23]
| |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:20 - Jun 23 with 1197 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:19 - Jun 23 by Suffolktractor |
Offside was given after the event once he got a shot away and it hit Semenyo.
Just so strange there was no reaction. |
Didnt look it. No var check?!
Just ran it back. Not offside. Not even close. Pen. And a red.
https://ibb.co/dw6DDKrB
Am increasingly concerned with the officiating in this tournament. Whilst they have been quick to wave away soft stuff, which is good, they have favoured the big teams repeatedly imo.
[Post edited 23 Jun 23:28]
| |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:02 - Jun 24 with 1007 views | tiptreeblue |
Obviously Scottish lol | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:14 - Jun 24 with 964 views | iamatractorboy |
I think the VAR must've been on their Hydration Break (TM) when that Konsa challenge took place. | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:27 - Jun 24 with 932 views | Dubtractor |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:53 - Jun 23 by surreyblue |
The striker lead with his studs and the first contact was the bottom of his foot against Pickford's shin |
Yep, think the ref got that right.
The second incident looked a nailed on penalty though. |  |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:30 - Jun 24 with 925 views | Steve_M |
| Thats a shocking decision on 22:36 - Jun 23 by Illinoisblue |
On replay, clear foul by Ghana player; leads with leg on Pickford. |
Yep, a good decision that one. |  |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:47 - Jun 24 with 876 views | CaptainAhab |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:20 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
Didnt look it. No var check?!
Just ran it back. Not offside. Not even close. Pen. And a red.
https://ibb.co/dw6DDKrB
Am increasingly concerned with the officiating in this tournament. Whilst they have been quick to wave away soft stuff, which is good, they have favoured the big teams repeatedly imo.
[Post edited 23 Jun 23:28]
|
The offside was for Semenyo who was hit by the follow up shot, well after the foul.
I was amazed that didn't get given/looked at/remarked upon. We got away with one there.
Pickford's challenge was the right decision though. | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:53 - Jun 24 with 856 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:47 - Jun 24 by CaptainAhab |
The offside was for Semenyo who was hit by the follow up shot, well after the foul.
I was amazed that didn't get given/looked at/remarked upon. We got away with one there.
Pickford's challenge was the right decision though. |
How can an honest var not have corrected this? It's either not being used or something fishy is happening. Which is why we see nothing of it and the commentators appear under instructions not to raise it. | |
| |
| Thats a shocking decision on 08:39 - Jun 24 with 760 views | CaptainAhab |
| Thats a shocking decision on 07:53 - Jun 24 by redrickstuhaart |
How can an honest var not have corrected this? It's either not being used or something fishy is happening. Which is why we see nothing of it and the commentators appear under instructions not to raise it. |
I'm not really one for conspiracy theories so not for me no. I think there have maybe been instructions to use VAR as little as possible, but that's about it.
I think what possibly saved England here was how little appeal Ghana made. If they'd made a fuss I expect it would have been looked at. Maybe the fella didn't realise he was fouled or the fact he then got a shot away distracted him. | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 09:44 - Jun 24 with 670 views | Simonds92 |
| Thats a shocking decision on 23:01 - Jun 23 by redrickstuhaart |
Perhaps more importantly...
at about 79 minutes, how is that not a pen and a red by Konsa?
Clear as day unless I missed a flag for something else? |
First one was a blatant foul by the Ghanaian striker on Pickford. Pickford pulls out the challenge and is then taken out.
The Konsa one you mention looked a penalty though. It's never a red card. Genuine attempt to play the ball so double jeopardy rule applies. Think that's been the case for about 10 years. | | | |
| Thats a shocking decision on 09:55 - Jun 24 with 639 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Thats a shocking decision on 09:44 - Jun 24 by Simonds92 |
First one was a blatant foul by the Ghanaian striker on Pickford. Pickford pulls out the challenge and is then taken out.
The Konsa one you mention looked a penalty though. It's never a red card. Genuine attempt to play the ball so double jeopardy rule applies. Think that's been the case for about 10 years. |
He was nowhere near the ball. Not convinced it was a genuine attempt. He would likely have received the benefit of the doubt though.
The big question is how is it not given. Was there a check. What was the result. Why is no information being given about such checks and why are commentators not mentioning them. Given how corrupt FIFA plainly is, there is a real issue of transparency here. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
