| I was wondering, part 4 17:20 - Jun 25 with 590 views | NthQldITFC |
If all posts had to be titled either "I was wondering, part X" or "Here's what I think, part Y", which of X and Y would be the larger? |  |
| |  |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:27 - Jun 25 with 540 views | GavTWTD |
I'd have strong words for not titling their threads correctly, to enable people to make an informed choice on whether to open the thread or not. |  |
| |
| Definitely "Y".... on 17:28 - Jun 25 with 534 views | Bloots |
....most posters on here don't want to hear other people's opinions they just want to tell you theirs.
End of discussion.
So shut it. |  |
| "....a smegma of a man” - TWTD User (Apr 2026) |
| |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:37 - Jun 25 with 495 views | le2blue |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:27 - Jun 25 by GavTWTD |
I'd have strong words for not titling their threads correctly, to enable people to make an informed choice on whether to open the thread or not. |
Out of interest, Gav, can you see what proportion of site users use Thread view vs Table view? As a long-standing thread mode by post date user, I tried switching last week and felt sick, so I switched back... totally different user experience.
On that note, how can I see when I started posting here? |  | | |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:39 - Jun 25 with 483 views | WD19 |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:27 - Jun 25 by GavTWTD |
I'd have strong words for not titling their threads correctly, to enable people to make an informed choice on whether to open the thread or not. |
Yes, but would it be a “here’s what I think” rant or a passive aggressive “I was wondering why people can’t label threads properly” approach? |  | | |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 18:19 - Jun 25 with 431 views | hoppy |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:37 - Jun 25 by le2blue |
Out of interest, Gav, can you see what proportion of site users use Thread view vs Table view? As a long-standing thread mode by post date user, I tried switching last week and felt sick, so I switched back... totally different user experience.
On that note, how can I see when I started posting here? |
I've always wondered whatever makes people use the old outdated thread mode, when table view is far more time economical and efficient, as well as much tidier looking. |  |
| |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 18:28 - Jun 25 with 402 views | SitfcB |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:27 - Jun 25 by GavTWTD |
I'd have strong words for not titling their threads correctly, to enable people to make an informed choice on whether to open the thread or not. |
Plus easier on the Google searches! |  |
| |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 18:48 - Jun 25 with 343 views | NthQldITFC |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 17:37 - Jun 25 by le2blue |
Out of interest, Gav, can you see what proportion of site users use Thread view vs Table view? As a long-standing thread mode by post date user, I tried switching last week and felt sick, so I switched back... totally different user experience.
On that note, how can I see when I started posting here? |
As I understand it, the free, TWTD-gifted match day tickets are not given out to random users of thread mode, or am I mistaken in that? | |
| |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 19:36 - Jun 25 with 294 views | BasingstokeBlue |
| I was wondering, part 4 on 18:19 - Jun 25 by hoppy |
I've always wondered whatever makes people use the old outdated thread mode, when table view is far more time economical and efficient, as well as much tidier looking. |
     |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
