Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Tuchel 04:18 - Jul 6 with 1188 viewsbsw72

Big calls tonight, showed awareness that the team were going to be backs to the wall for last 20-30 mins, put on Spence and Burns and the team defended brilliantly. Doubled up down both flanks and allowed the central defenders to fill the area.

What an extraordinary display, with 10 men for over 45 mins against a side who had not lost a competitive game at home since 2013.

This is a very different England team.
6
Tuchel on 04:22 - Jul 6 with 1133 viewsScuzzer

Exactly right.

Established 1968

0
Tuchel on 04:36 - Jul 6 with 1081 viewspointofblue

Not sure. Thought we invited pressure with those changes - we had an outlet before the subs. Taking Anderson off whilst defending a lead was a bit strange too. We held on and won, though. That's all that matters.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

-1
Tuchel on 04:44 - Jul 6 with 1046 viewsSE1blue

Love his emotion too.

Whether is celebrating a goal or losing his mind for a bad ref decision, he’s fully committed.

Poll: Should VAR be scrapped?
Blog: D-I-V-O-R-C-E

2
Tuchel on 05:12 - Jul 6 with 1009 views_CliveBaker_

Yeah I don’t think he had much choice at that stage, but our best hope of getting out of there with the win was to defend what we had, and that’s exactly what we did. Not sure I’d have fancied ET had they found an equaliser.
1
Tuchel on 08:22 - Jul 6 with 698 viewsBlueRaider

Tuchel on 05:12 - Jul 6 by _CliveBaker_

Yeah I don’t think he had much choice at that stage, but our best hope of getting out of there with the win was to defend what we had, and that’s exactly what we did. Not sure I’d have fancied ET had they found an equaliser.


Yes, I think we'd have been toast in extra time

Blog: Yellow Cards and Why They Bug Me

0
Tuchel on 08:32 - Jul 6 with 666 viewsBiGDonnie

Tuchel on 04:36 - Jul 6 by pointofblue

Not sure. Thought we invited pressure with those changes - we had an outlet before the subs. Taking Anderson off whilst defending a lead was a bit strange too. We held on and won, though. That's all that matters.


What would you have done?

COYBs
Poll: Is it too soon to sack Hurst?

0
Tuchel on 09:18 - Jul 6 with 598 viewsbsw72

Tuchel on 04:36 - Jul 6 by pointofblue

Not sure. Thought we invited pressure with those changes - we had an outlet before the subs. Taking Anderson off whilst defending a lead was a bit strange too. We held on and won, though. That's all that matters.


What an odd take, he didn't invite pressure, he set the team out to cope with the pressure which we faced as a result of having a man less and Mexico going all out for goals.

He took Anderson off as he changed the team shape to cope with the attacking Mexico changes and Anderson's role was not required?
0
Tuchel on 09:29 - Jul 6 with 548 viewsbsw72

Tuchel on 08:22 - Jul 6 by BlueRaider

Yes, I think we'd have been toast in extra time


What was interesting though is that Tuchel held back 1 sub, and his last sub was bringing on a fresh attacking midfielder.

Had we conceded, he would have still had 2 changes to make in ET vs the one which Mexico would have had, and having brought on Rogers, could have strengthened the holding midfielder and put Watkins or Toney on up front.

The option to then play the longer ball and have the pace to take advantage would have been there with against a tiring Mexico defence.
[Post edited 6 Jul 9:30]
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026