| Sears Edwards. 14:03 - Sep 20 with 1463 views | Wickets |
With Freddy being right footed and Gwion declaring he prefers the left anyone any theories as to why they seem to be the other way round ? Not that i'm complaining about our 100% record .Just wondering . |  | | |  |
| Sears Edwards. on 14:06 - Sep 20 with 1438 views | Bluefish |
Most of Freddie's best work here has also been down the left. Ideally we will soon start with Freddie on the left as a right footer and Lankester on the right as a left footer. |  |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 14:42 - Sep 20 with 1350 views | JoHnNnY |
Best foot for shooting when cutting inside. |  |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 19:58 - Sep 20 with 1100 views | Garv |
I wouldn't fancy Sears down the right but equally you really want Edwards on the left. Ideally your two wide men would be genuine wide men, meaning Edwards left and Lankester right. Sears is useful - and deserves his place - but he shouldn't be out there really. [Post edited 20 Sep 2020 19:58]
|  |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 20:52 - Sep 20 with 1037 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Sears Edwards. on 19:58 - Sep 20 by Garv |
I wouldn't fancy Sears down the right but equally you really want Edwards on the left. Ideally your two wide men would be genuine wide men, meaning Edwards left and Lankester right. Sears is useful - and deserves his place - but he shouldn't be out there really. [Post edited 20 Sep 2020 19:58]
|
Would you play Sears through the middle then?
I think it is nice to have the options. Sears seems to be linking up well with Ward and Edwards with Chambers. A lot of effective football is about creating partnerships on the pitch. |  |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 00:10 - Sep 21 with 955 views | ArnieM |
| Sears Edwards. on 20:52 - Sep 20 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Would you play Sears through the middle then?
I think it is nice to have the options. Sears seems to be linking up well with Ward and Edwards with Chambers. A lot of effective football is about creating partnerships on the pitch. |
It certainly worked under SBR . “ little triangles” (partnerships), all over the pitch in that great side! |  |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 11:18 - Sep 21 with 834 views | Garv |
| Sears Edwards. on 20:52 - Sep 20 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Would you play Sears through the middle then?
I think it is nice to have the options. Sears seems to be linking up well with Ward and Edwards with Chambers. A lot of effective football is about creating partnerships on the pitch. |
Not over our other options no. Yeah he's 100% earning his place simply due to how willing a runner he is and his knack of popping up with goals and assists. | |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 11:25 - Sep 21 with 821 views | Herbivore |
| Sears Edwards. on 19:58 - Sep 20 by Garv |
I wouldn't fancy Sears down the right but equally you really want Edwards on the left. Ideally your two wide men would be genuine wide men, meaning Edwards left and Lankester right. Sears is useful - and deserves his place - but he shouldn't be out there really. [Post edited 20 Sep 2020 19:58]
|
You need to have at least one wide forward in a 4-3-3 rather than wingers. Sears should be capable of 10-15 goals playing from the left and I can't see either Edwards or Lankester being about to replicate that. The risk of playing wingers rather than wide forwards is that the central striker gets isolated and it effectively becomes a 4-5-1. |  |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 23:10 - Sep 21 with 706 views | Garv |
| Sears Edwards. on 11:25 - Sep 21 by Herbivore |
You need to have at least one wide forward in a 4-3-3 rather than wingers. Sears should be capable of 10-15 goals playing from the left and I can't see either Edwards or Lankester being about to replicate that. The risk of playing wingers rather than wide forwards is that the central striker gets isolated and it effectively becomes a 4-5-1. |
That's it. His goal threat and overall usefulness means he's probably there to stay.
Or would you be looking to replace him with Jackson? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sears Edwards. on 23:16 - Sep 21 with 692 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Sears Edwards. on 11:25 - Sep 21 by Herbivore |
You need to have at least one wide forward in a 4-3-3 rather than wingers. Sears should be capable of 10-15 goals playing from the left and I can't see either Edwards or Lankester being about to replicate that. The risk of playing wingers rather than wide forwards is that the central striker gets isolated and it effectively becomes a 4-5-1. |
I actually think Edwards and Lankester probably could do that playing as wide forwards. I also think Sears is more suited to it and has earned his place. Don't forget Edwards scored a decent number from the wing in the Championship when he first joined.
I think this formation suits these players well.
EDIT: Hopefully Jackson can play that role too and offer pace off the bench against tiring legs. [Post edited 21 Sep 2020 23:18]
| |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 23:17 - Sep 21 with 688 views | Herbivore |
| Sears Edwards. on 23:10 - Sep 21 by Garv |
That's it. His goal threat and overall usefulness means he's probably there to stay.
Or would you be looking to replace him with Jackson? |
Tough one really. I think Jackson has potential as a wide forward but Lambert doesn't seem to think so. Sears we know can be effective in that role. | |
| |
| Sears Edwards. on 09:22 - Sep 22 with 586 views | Wickets |
| Sears Edwards. on 23:17 - Sep 21 by Herbivore |
Tough one really. I think Jackson has potential as a wide forward but Lambert doesn't seem to think so. Sears we know can be effective in that role. |
I cant really see where else Jackson could play in this system . Sears, Edwards, Judge, and Jackson should give us options wide in a three . | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
