| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) 19:44 - Oct 27 with 1280 views | EricsGate |
|  |
| |  |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 19:46 - Oct 27 with 1263 views | nodge_blue |
I assume you mean Gillingham. |  |
| |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 19:52 - Oct 27 with 1192 views | reusersfreekicks |
Garbage - the op statement that is |  | | |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 19:56 - Oct 27 with 1120 views | SuperCoops |
I think we've knocked the ball round well and looks a decent performance without scoring. Gills are no threat so far at all.
Just need to make the dominance count in the second half. |  | | |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 20:00 - Oct 27 with 1082 views | EricsGate |
Gillingham have been utter garbage
Bet we lose this 0-2 in the end. | |
| |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 20:55 - Oct 27 with 881 views | itfc_bucks |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 20:00 - Oct 27 by EricsGate |
Gillingham have been utter garbage
Bet we lose this 0-2 in the end. |
I'll take that bet.
Fiver? | | | |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:04 - Oct 27 with 770 views | backwaywhen |
Correct we looked Bl##dy awful in second half , why oh why was Edwards on the right most of the match , we need a good kiss up the arris after that. | | | |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:05 - Oct 27 with 744 views | pointofblue |
Maybe the OP had somehow seen the whole game already - first half was alright but second half was dreadful. | |
| |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:05 - Oct 27 with 740 views | AlexGreen |
Nonsense. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:08 - Oct 27 with 707 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:05 - Oct 27 by pointofblue |
Maybe the OP had somehow seen the whole game already - first half was alright but second half was dreadful. |
Good job they couldn't take their chances.
However, once again the referee didn't do us many favours. Twice we would have had a penalty with the ref from Saturday. How the one on Edwards wasn't I have no idea. Lots of niggly fouls on Hawkins going unpunished but a similar nudge on one of their players, down they go and it is a free kick.
Got the result and that's what matters but we need more goal threat than we carried today and our defence was not solid. |  |
| |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:09 - Oct 27 with 686 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:08 - Oct 27 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Good job they couldn't take their chances.
However, once again the referee didn't do us many favours. Twice we would have had a penalty with the ref from Saturday. How the one on Edwards wasn't I have no idea. Lots of niggly fouls on Hawkins going unpunished but a similar nudge on one of their players, down they go and it is a free kick.
Got the result and that's what matters but we need more goal threat than we carried today and our defence was not solid. |
Err which one on Edwards? | | | |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:56 - Oct 27 with 586 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Very very VERY Poor (n/t) on 21:09 - Oct 27 by reusersfreekicks |
Err which one on Edwards? |
Is that because there was more than one or because you can't recall it?
Edwards just had an open goal to tap into and the chap took him out, then got up and cleared the ball. Nailed on pen that one.
The other I saw was a little niggle at Bishop's heels in the area, the ball comes out and the same challenge outside the area got the free kick that Dozzell put just wide. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
