Forum | Shares by Nthsuffolkblue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Shares 14:24 - Apr 9 with 498 views

Apparently the new owners are obliged to make an offer and this is likely to be the original value of them.

I am sure no shareholder ever expected to get their money back but now the questions are these:

Do we want to keep the shares because they represent a small part of ownership of our club?

Should Gamechanger succeed in their objectives and manage to sell the club in the Premier League for a profit, would the shares actually go up in value?

Poll:	Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Shares on 14:26 - Apr 9 with 480 views

J2BLUE

Likely to be the original value? Doubt it. where did you read that?

	Truly impaired.
Poll:	Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

Shares on 14:29 - Apr 9 with 457 views

StokieBlue

It won't be the original value.

It will probably be the value that they paid to ME for his shares. That is standard in company takeovers, they are usually obliged to offer all shareholders the same price.

SB

Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula

Shares on 14:33 - Apr 9 with 435 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Shares on 14:29 - Apr 9 by StokieBlue
It won't be the original value. It will probably be the value that they paid to ME for his shares. That is standard in company takeovers, they are usually obliged to offer all shareholders the same price. SB

OK. Thanks.

Any ideas how much that is.

Was told original value by someone who thought they read it somewhere.

Isn't it complicated by the fact that the shares are not directly in the club but rather in a separate company that has some small share in the club?

Poll:	Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread