| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 22:06 - Oct 12 with 996 views | Swansea_Blue |
I can see the Lower Holbrook station being a bottleneck during rush hour, with both passengers trying to get off at the same time. |  |
|  |
| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 22:10 - Oct 12 with 986 views | ronnyd |
| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 22:06 - Oct 12 by Swansea_Blue |
I can see the Lower Holbrook station being a bottleneck during rush hour, with both passengers trying to get off at the same time. |
It'll put the foot ferries out of business. |  | | |
| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 00:56 - Oct 13 with 886 views | Rocky |
I think we have already had a perfectly good underground railway in Ipswich for many years, why change it? |  | | |
| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 09:34 - Oct 13 with 674 views | ghostofescobar |
I’d forgotten what a fine piece of work that is. Oh to have been around in the days when I could have zipped about the town via the mighty Ipswich underground. |  |
| |
| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 10:08 - Oct 13 with 614 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
Slow news day in Ipswich? |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 10:53 - Oct 13 with 566 views | Cotty |
I notice that the Woodbridge line doesn't actually stop in Woodbridge |  | | |
| Like the idea, but he’s behind the times… on 11:30 - Oct 13 with 492 views | Steve_M |
The caption on the Tube map picture is pure Archant:
"The London underground is far larger than the proposed Ipswich network - Credit: Transport for London" |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
