| you have mail 20:40 - Oct 10 with 936 views | HARRY10 |
"The former Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre told the Leveson inquiry in 2011 that voicemail interception never took place at his company.
“I cannot be any more unequivocal, that all my inquiries and all the evidence I’ve received, and having spoken to the editor of my group: our group did not hack phones,” he said."
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/oct/10/ex-lib-dem-mp-simon-hughes-makes-p
hmm, evidence now suggests otherwise (link below)
https://expose.news/
* Private Investigators allege that landlines were tapped — a much more serious offence than phone hacking.
* Further allegations include breaking into cars and bugging homes.
Lawyers claim that medical records were ‘blagged’ from hospitals and bank statements were obtained by deception.
* However, the paper’s long-serving Editor-in-Chief Paul Dacre denied his papers hacked phones in sworn evidence at the Leveson Inquiry.
* If it turns out the Mail were involved and he knew, Dacre potentially faces 51 weeks in jail for misleading a public inquiry.
* Dacre’s forthcoming ennoblement now in doubt
In what is thought to be the Nuremberg trials of the 21st century, righties are being hauled up before the court - Hatie Hopkins, our poundshop Oswald Mosely (Yaxley-Lennon), Alex Jones, Trump.... can the bloater and Fartrage be far behind, I ask myself ? |  | | |  |
| you have mail on 10:54 - Oct 11 with 701 views | bluelagos |
"If it turns out the Mail were involved and he knew, Dacre potentially faces 51 weeks in jail for misleading a public inquiry. "
What's your source for that Harry? Am unaware that misleading a public inquiry is a criminal offense as the law currently stands. |  |
| |
| you have mail on 10:56 - Oct 11 with 685 views | PhilTWTD |
| you have mail on 10:54 - Oct 11 by bluelagos |
"If it turns out the Mail were involved and he knew, Dacre potentially faces 51 weeks in jail for misleading a public inquiry. "
What's your source for that Harry? Am unaware that misleading a public inquiry is a criminal offense as the law currently stands. |
I read that somewhere the other day as well. Just checked and it was here: https://bylineinvestigates.com/2022/10/06/daily-mail-is-being-sued-for-the-most- |  | | |
| you have mail on 10:58 - Oct 11 with 661 views | bluelagos |
Cheers.
"Giving false or distorted testimony to public inquiry under oath is a jailable office under s35 of the Inquiries Act."
Will have a read up on that. | |
| |
| you have mail on 14:07 - Oct 11 with 558 views | HARRY10 |
| you have mail on 10:58 - Oct 11 by bluelagos |
Cheers.
"Giving false or distorted testimony to public inquiry under oath is a jailable office under s35 of the Inquiries Act."
Will have a read up on that. |
"Section 17(2) of the 2005 Act allows for evidence to be taken on oath."
Which depends on whether Dacre gave evidence to that enquiry under oath, in which case it would be deemed perjury. Which I believe was what nailed Jeffrey Archer - 4 year sentence.
The same may apply to the bloater when he is called to give evidence to the privilege's committee, as they have the power to require evidence to be given under oath. Under oath is not akin to holding up two fingers and saying 'scouts honour' either. It has implications.
So was Dacre's testimony to the Leveson enquiry under oath ?
"For one thing the oath, by which Dacre swore to tell the whole truth and nothing but "
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/feb/06/paul-dacre-leveson-inquiry-sketch | | | |
| you have mail on 14:38 - Oct 11 with 513 views | Swansea_Blue |
I'm surprised more's not being made of this. Are we all suffering from corruption fatigue? This SHOULD be absolutely huge. |  |
| |
| you have mail on 14:47 - Oct 11 with 486 views | HARRY10 |
| you have mail on 14:38 - Oct 11 by Swansea_Blue |
I'm surprised more's not being made of this. Are we all suffering from corruption fatigue? This SHOULD be absolutely huge. |
There is no benefit from the rightie media in covering this. I think that as it includes Juan Carlos's boy, it will hit the headlines when the enquiry publishes it's report.
While the methods to obtain this stuff are to be deplored, little seems to be done about holding those media sources or certain politicians from spewing out blatant lies.
This has not aged well
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1218703/boris-promises-cheaper-household-gas-bills
BORIS Johnson and Michael Gove today promise to scrap VAT on household energy bills if Britain backs a Brexit.
"The NHS will be stronger, class sizes smaller, and taxes lower."[/]
Not projections - but promises, they signed | | | |
| you have mail on 19:12 - Oct 11 with 444 views | HARRY10 |
| you have mail on 14:38 - Oct 11 by Swansea_Blue |
I'm surprised more's not being made of this. Are we all suffering from corruption fatigue? This SHOULD be absolutely huge. |
Much as I thought
"The Sun is facing fresh allegations that phone hacking took place at the newspaper, including when the News UK chief executive, Rebekah Brooks, was editor." Tue 11 Oct 2022 17.21 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/oct/11/the-sun-faces-fresh-claims-of-phon | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
