By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
From the looks of the camera angles shown on TV there was not a single line of sight between the attacker and the possible playing-onside defender, so two different angles had to be considered against one another and some logistics done. To my eye it was clear, but I get it because if they jump to an assumption then it's proven otherwise after the game it would all get messy. If it was Ipswich attacking I'd want them to take as long and be sure before cancelling the goal.
1
VAR for their offside goal. on 22:08 - Dec 30 with 661 views
Did my usual walk around of the forums this evening. Leicester fans apoplectic as usual and again, we are the luckiest, cheatiest club going. No mention of how they've cheated FFP two years in a row (and still in bottom three) and one of their players assulted Chaplin and got away with it.