Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
VAR for their offside goal. 22:05 - Dec 30 with 740 viewsFromReuserWithLove

Why on earth did it take so long? It seemed so clear and obvious or am i missing something?

Oh and what a fantastic performance that was.
1
VAR for their offside goal. on 22:06 - Dec 30 with 715 viewsbournemouthblue

If a top six side is involved, they do their best to find a way to give it in their favour

That seems to be how it works

Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll: How much for Omari

1
VAR for their offside goal. on 22:07 - Dec 30 with 690 viewsurbanpenguin

From the looks of the camera angles shown on TV there was not a single line of sight between the attacker and the possible playing-onside defender, so two different angles had to be considered against one another and some logistics done. To my eye it was clear, but I get it because if they jump to an assumption then it's proven otherwise after the game it would all get messy. If it was Ipswich attacking I'd want them to take as long and be sure before cancelling the goal.
1
VAR for their offside goal. on 22:08 - Dec 30 with 661 viewsgainsboroughblue

Did my usual walk around of the forums this evening. Leicester fans apoplectic as usual and again, we are the luckiest, cheatiest club going. No mention of how they've cheated FFP two years in a row (and still in bottom three) and one of their players assulted Chaplin and got away with it.

Poll: Favourite Norwich Relegation?

0
(No subject) (n/t) on 22:09 - Dec 30 with 635 viewsVic

[Post edited 30 Dec 2024 22:09]

Poll: Right now, who would you rather have as Prime Minister?

1
VAR for their offside goal. on 22:09 - Dec 30 with 626 viewsSwansea_Blue

They were trying to decide whether to go with the ravioli or the coq au vin.


Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025