Nearly 14:55 13:05 - Feb 24 with 1056 views | stevec7 | That’s when so many on here and Twitter said that is the time today that Lambert gets sacked |  | | |  |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:09 - Feb 24 with 1011 views | ipswichtillidie | Reckon it will be tomorrow after the meeting and perhaps even announced Friday or late Thursday. |  |
|  |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:14 - Feb 24 with 972 views | chrismakin |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:09 - Feb 24 by ipswichtillidie | Reckon it will be tomorrow after the meeting and perhaps even announced Friday or late Thursday. |
He wont be sacked. Clearly the last Friday call was "you have 3 games" to turn it around. Hence the massive upturn in performances and effort from the team since that phone call. |  |
|  |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:14 - Feb 24 with 969 views | stevec7 |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:09 - Feb 24 by ipswichtillidie | Reckon it will be tomorrow after the meeting and perhaps even announced Friday or late Thursday. |
He just seemed so miserable last night in the interview after the game |  | |  |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:22 - Feb 24 with 910 views | ipswichtillidie |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:14 - Feb 24 by stevec7 | He just seemed so miserable last night in the interview after the game |
The writing is in the wall. The meeting tomorrow can only go one way. I’m sure tomorrow it will happen and announcement not too long afterwards. Unless there is something in this take over that will delay the whole process of Lambert being moved on.... |  |
|  |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:36 - Feb 24 with 817 views | PJH |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:14 - Feb 24 by chrismakin | He wont be sacked. Clearly the last Friday call was "you have 3 games" to turn it around. Hence the massive upturn in performances and effort from the team since that phone call. |
So you are saying that the team were not trying previously but now that PL has been, according to you, been given three games they are so desperate to keep him so they now start trying. Yep, that makes sense. |  | |  |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:46 - Feb 24 with 773 views | chrismakin |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:36 - Feb 24 by PJH | So you are saying that the team were not trying previously but now that PL has been, according to you, been given three games they are so desperate to keep him so they now start trying. Yep, that makes sense. |
Think of the players hes separated from the pack Hes dropped wolfy ( who spoke up about Lambert. Sent Jackson and Nolan to the u23s) You can change a style all you like but you need to see player work ethic like no other to see high pressure working. The effort of the team lately is very much different to that of recent games especially the state of that Northampton game. So yes I do see it possible. |  |
|  |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:49 - Feb 24 with 746 views | BlueBadger |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:22 - Feb 24 by ipswichtillidie | The writing is in the wall. The meeting tomorrow can only go one way. I’m sure tomorrow it will happen and announcement not too long afterwards. Unless there is something in this take over that will delay the whole process of Lambert being moved on.... |
'The meeting tomorrow can only go one way' Lambert cons Evans into keeping him on, yet again? |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Nearly 14:55 on 13:56 - Feb 24 with 717 views | Swansea_Blue |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:49 - Feb 24 by BlueBadger | 'The meeting tomorrow can only go one way' Lambert cons Evans into keeping him on, yet again? |
It's probably not a difficult con in fairness. It's like being managed by an unfunny Chuckle Brothers. |  |
|  |
Nearly 14:55 on 14:01 - Feb 24 with 681 views | WeWereZombies |
Nearly 14:55 on 13:56 - Feb 24 by Swansea_Blue | It's probably not a difficult con in fairness. It's like being managed by an unfunny Chuckle Brothers. |
My guess is that Lambert is the one who says 'to you'. And Evans is the one who says, err, 'to you'... |  |
|  |
Nearly 14:55 on 14:08 - Feb 24 with 649 views | BlueBadger |
Nearly 14:55 on 14:01 - Feb 24 by WeWereZombies | My guess is that Lambert is the one who says 'to you'. And Evans is the one who says, err, 'to you'... |
Lambert is definitely self-obsessed enough to be saying 'to me'... |  |
|  |
| |