| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) 16:10 - Jan 31 with 3326 views | JackSted |
|  |
| |  |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:14 - Jan 31 with 3226 views | Illinoisblue |
Wonder if the pension fund have said we need to trim costs. Lot of outgoings today. [Post edited 31 Jan 2022 16:15]
|  |
| |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:16 - Jan 31 with 3147 views | Keno |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:14 - Jan 31 by Illinoisblue |
Wonder if the pension fund have said we need to trim costs. Lot of outgoings today. [Post edited 31 Jan 2022 16:15]
|
nah, its to make way for Rashford and Pogba
I mentioned the link earlier and Phil hasn't denied it |  |
| |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:35 - Jan 31 with 2676 views | bluejacko |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:16 - Jan 31 by Keno |
nah, its to make way for Rashford and Pogba
I mentioned the link earlier and Phil hasn't denied it |
Both of them will have to cheer up a bit😀 can’t have any disruptive people in the dressing room you know! |  | | |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:43 - Jan 31 with 2465 views | jayessess |
Nah. No way Cambridge could afford his wages, no way they'd be able to promise Pigott he could start when Ironside comes back from injury. |  |
| |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:48 - Jan 31 with 2339 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:14 - Jan 31 by Illinoisblue |
Wonder if the pension fund have said we need to trim costs. Lot of outgoings today. [Post edited 31 Jan 2022 16:15]
|
Small change to them. |  |
| |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:51 - Jan 31 with 2194 views | Sparky85 |
Peter Odemwingie is sat in PR car park as expected replacement 
In all seriousness, the Pigott rumour has some traction it seems. Can't see we would leave ourselves short in numbers upfront unless there are plans for Simpson | | | |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 17:42 - Jan 31 with 1722 views | billlm |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:14 - Jan 31 by Illinoisblue |
Wonder if the pension fund have said we need to trim costs. Lot of outgoings today. [Post edited 31 Jan 2022 16:15]
|
What I thought |  | | |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 17:52 - Jan 31 with 1624 views | jayessess |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:14 - Jan 31 by Illinoisblue |
Wonder if the pension fund have said we need to trim costs. Lot of outgoings today. [Post edited 31 Jan 2022 16:15]
|
I doubt it. We still have a big squad, we're just moving out players we don't need.
[Post edited 31 Jan 2022 17:55]
| |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 17:58 - Jan 31 with 1542 views | Churchman |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 16:14 - Jan 31 by Illinoisblue |
Wonder if the pension fund have said we need to trim costs. Lot of outgoings today. [Post edited 31 Jan 2022 16:15]
|
If that was the case I doubt we’d have bought Walton or extended Bonne’s loan. I doubt we’d have cleared out Cook and friends, let alone take on Directors of this that and the other either. I suspect with interested parties, they’d have shipped out Norwood too, who appears not to be at the top of their Xmas card list.
The answer will come at the AGM. If things like proposed ground improvements have been put in the dustbin, you may have a point. |  | | |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 22:18 - Jan 31 with 989 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Pigott to Cambridge (n/t) on 17:52 - Jan 31 by jayessess |
I doubt it. We still have a big squad, we're just moving out players we don't need.
[Post edited 31 Jan 2022 17:55]
|
Indeed. Cook put together an unbalanced and bloated squad. Needed a bit of tweaking and some trimming. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
