| Man City 19:17 - Feb 26 with 733 views | Scuzzer |
...how on earth did VAR not give that handball?
Oh yes...its Man City. The FA's choice for Champions this year.
|  |
| |  |
| Man City on 19:20 - Feb 26 with 700 views | strikalite |
The ruling has changed I'm sure, top of the arm is not handball now.. |  | | |
| Man City on 19:22 - Feb 26 with 688 views | mattyhollandsirish |
I think it's because we're on version 57.6 of changing the handball rule to a point where none of us have any idea what's going on. |  | | |
| Man City on 19:23 - Feb 26 with 687 views | Scuzzer |
| Man City on 19:20 - Feb 26 by strikalite |
The ruling has changed I'm sure, top of the arm is not handball now.. |
Define top of the arm....from the elbow up.
That hit him full square on the bicep. | |
| |
| Man City on 19:23 - Feb 26 with 685 views | ZXBlue |
| Man City on 19:20 - Feb 26 by strikalite |
The ruling has changed I'm sure, top of the arm is not handball now.. |
Rule appears to be to draw a line from the armpit across. | | | |
| Man City on 19:24 - Feb 26 with 675 views | Scuzzer |
| Man City on 19:22 - Feb 26 by mattyhollandsirish |
I think it's because we're on version 57.6 of changing the handball rule to a point where none of us have any idea what's going on. |
Including the officials. | |
| |
| Man City on 19:27 - Feb 26 with 651 views | strikalite |
| Man City on 19:23 - Feb 26 by Scuzzer |
Define top of the arm....from the elbow up.
That hit him full square on the bicep. |
I knew you were going to ask that :), agree its fine margins, check out what the pundits say after this.. | | | |
| Man City on 19:35 - Feb 26 with 625 views | Radlett_blue |
| Man City on 19:23 - Feb 26 by Scuzzer |
Define top of the arm....from the elbow up.
That hit him full square on the bicep. |
Exactly - it hit him. Never a handball in my view, but the interpretation of the law has become absurd. |  |
| |
| Man City on 19:37 - Feb 26 with 605 views | Scuzzer |
| Man City on 19:35 - Feb 26 by Radlett_blue |
Exactly - it hit him. Never a handball in my view, but the interpretation of the law has become absurd. |
It hit him! For goodness sakes man. He controlled the ball from the action. All day handball. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Man City on 19:40 - Feb 26 with 587 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Man City on 19:37 - Feb 26 by Scuzzer |
It hit him! For goodness sakes man. He controlled the ball from the action. All day handball. |
Calm down. |  |
| |
| Man City on 19:40 - Feb 26 with 584 views | EastTownBlue |
| Man City on 19:23 - Feb 26 by Scuzzer |
Define top of the arm....from the elbow up.
That hit him full square on the bicep. |
I haven’t seen the incident but this is what is defined as part of the arm which cannot be defined as a handball:
| | | |
| Man City on 19:54 - Feb 26 with 532 views | Churchman |
It looked stonewall to me. The look on the player’s face said ‘oh noooo, made a rick there’. He knew it alright.
With VAR I can only think that if it had happened at the other end, it would have been given. |  | | |
| Man City on 20:05 - Feb 26 with 500 views | FrimleyBlue |
What I don't get is why couldn't the ref take a look himself too? clearly in game speed meant he was never going to give that as a pen without VAR, he should then get the right to review the screen himself not some random who's had a cheeky tenner on man city.
Btw clearly joking about the tenner, |  |
| |
| Man City on 20:10 - Feb 26 with 474 views | strikalite |
| Man City on 20:05 - Feb 26 by FrimleyBlue |
What I don't get is why couldn't the ref take a look himself too? clearly in game speed meant he was never going to give that as a pen without VAR, he should then get the right to review the screen himself not some random who's had a cheeky tenner on man city.
Btw clearly joking about the tenner, |
The ref can only go look at it again if he gave the pen and then VAR think he's made the wrong decision and will ask him to take a look at it... | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
