Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Not a penalty in my eyes 19:12 - Dec 5 with 951 viewsBobsthename

Geezer came in on the defenders blind side.
0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:13 - Dec 5 with 942 viewsCrock

Rubbish goalkeeping for the penalty.

Poll: Favourite number?

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:14 - Dec 5 with 940 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Nicked the ball off him before the defender caught his foot. Definite pen. EDIT: nothing in the rules to say you cannot tackle from the blindside.
[Post edited 5 Dec 2022 19:15]

Poll: How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:15 - Dec 5 with 919 viewsCafe_Newman

Absolute madness. Where was VAR to confirm that Richarlison fell over?
0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:16 - Dec 5 with 905 viewsMullet

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:14 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue

Nicked the ball off him before the defender caught his foot. Definite pen. EDIT: nothing in the rules to say you cannot tackle from the blindside.
[Post edited 5 Dec 2022 19:15]


Why was there no VAR check? Ref obviously overruled it, but seems odd given how much they used it in some games for the most minor or subtle things.

Poll: Which itfc kit do you usually buy
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 with 888 viewsScuzzer

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:14 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue

Nicked the ball off him before the defender caught his foot. Definite pen. EDIT: nothing in the rules to say you cannot tackle from the blindside.
[Post edited 5 Dec 2022 19:15]


Nah....tackling from behind has been a foul for decades.
The defender was in the process of clearing the ball...no challenge was made on the Brazilian.

Established 1968

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 with 884 viewsMeadowlark

Also made no contact.......in the quick replays they showed.
0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:22 - Dec 5 with 841 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 by Scuzzer

Nah....tackling from behind has been a foul for decades.
The defender was in the process of clearing the ball...no challenge was made on the Brazilian.


Which rule states that "tackling from behind" is a foul?

Poll: How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:24 - Dec 5 with 827 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:18 - Dec 5 by Meadowlark

Also made no contact.......in the quick replays they showed.


Richarlison made no contact when pinching the ball. The defender's swing at the ball then misses the ball and hits Richarlison's foot.

There was no VAR check because it was a clear penalty.

Poll: How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

1
Login to get fewer ads

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:25 - Dec 5 with 811 viewsDubtractor

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:24 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue

Richarlison made no contact when pinching the ball. The defender's swing at the ball then misses the ball and hits Richarlison's foot.

There was no VAR check because it was a clear penalty.


The very very simple giveaway, is that not one Korean player protested the decision at all.

I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun. I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Poll: Important Christmas poll - which is the best Celebration chocolate?

1
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:27 - Dec 5 with 799 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:22 - Dec 5 by Nthsuffolkblue

Which rule states that "tackling from behind" is a foul?


And, if it was, Macauley Bonne would never have been able to score that goal against Wednesday.

Poll: How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:27 - Dec 5 with 797 viewsMullet

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:25 - Dec 5 by Dubtractor

The very very simple giveaway, is that not one Korean player protested the decision at all.


Maybe they're just being polite?

Poll: Which itfc kit do you usually buy
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:28 - Dec 5 with 787 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:27 - Dec 5 by Mullet

Maybe they're just being polite?


Beautiful goal there.

Poll: How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Not a penalty in my eyes on 20:26 - Dec 5 with 702 viewsCafe_Newman

Not a penalty in my eyes on 19:25 - Dec 5 by Dubtractor

The very very simple giveaway, is that not one Korean player protested the decision at all.


I've known Koreans for decades. The only thing I've known them to complain about is poor quality wifi or phone network.
2




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025