| Scenes at old Trafford 14:11 - Jan 14 with 1658 views | Illinoisblue |
My word |  |
| |  |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:31 - Jan 14 with 1485 views | Samuelowen88 |
Ludicrous decision for United's first goal |  |
| |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:36 - Jan 14 with 1422 views | Illinoisblue |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:31 - Jan 14 by Samuelowen88 |
Ludicrous decision for United's first goal |
By the law it was correct but in the real world it’s so ridiculous | |
| |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:38 - Jan 14 with 1365 views | tractorshark |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:31 - Jan 14 by Samuelowen88 |
Ludicrous decision for United's first goal |
Agree. Ridiculous law.
Just can’t see how anyone can say Rashford wasn’t active or that he didn’t interfere or influence the defenders. If he’d stopped running towards the ball, then fair enough. Only thing is the keeper and defenders should have made more attempt to win the ball.
If that had happened to Ipswich, I’d be going nuts.
The offside law is bonkers right now and still open to interpretation.
In the first half they gave an offside even though the ball didn’t reach the attacker. That was given because of intent, what’s the difference with Rashford? He intentionally ran towards the ball.
The inconsistencies are shocking and VAR hasn’t improved things. |  | | |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:59 - Jan 14 with 1231 views | Chrisd |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:36 - Jan 14 by Illinoisblue |
By the law it was correct but in the real world it’s so ridiculous |
It is a ridiculous decision. Yes, Rashford hasn't touched the ball, but how is he not interfering with play? The offside rule now is too overcomplicated, go back to how it was ,if you are in an offside position like Rashford was - you're offside. | |
| |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 15:06 - Jan 14 with 1189 views | ronnyd |
As Shankly once said, "if he's not interfering with play, why is he on the pitch?" | | | |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 15:24 - Jan 14 with 1084 views | Crawfordsboot |
I was in the crowd.
United deserved to win. Restricted City to just the one chance. Fred did a good job on DeBrynne and Shaw shadowed Haaland everywhere. |  | | |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 16:13 - Jan 14 with 873 views | ronnyd |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 15:24 - Jan 14 by Crawfordsboot |
I was in the crowd.
United deserved to win. Restricted City to just the one chance. Fred did a good job on DeBrynne and Shaw shadowed Haaland everywhere. |
Possession stats crazy too. Citeh had over 70% but only one shot on target. Believe it was similar in Roth v Blackburn match where Rovers got tanked. Goals win matches. | | | |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 16:48 - Jan 14 with 794 views | stonojnr |
| Scenes at old Trafford on 14:36 - Jan 14 by Illinoisblue |
By the law it was correct but in the real world it’s so ridiculous |
The law is a donkey shaped equine then.
How is a centre forward running towards goal who is covering any chance of man City just booting the ball away then not interfering with play ?
Is the law also saying he can't be tackled as he's not in possession of the ball so even though it wouldn't be clear goal scoring chance it would be an "off the ball tackle", and does that mean a tackle on Fernandes became the clear goal scoring chance !?!
Plus how did Man City not get a penalty when their player got knee'd behind the knee, without that he's getting that ball ?
#modernfootballisrubbish | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
