| The South Yorkshire View on 19:13 - Jan 23 with 1781 views | LankHenners |
Think they've clearly gone to have a little dig at us - framed as being punished for hubris and getting a line about 'big-spending Ipswich' in at the end. |  |
|  |
| The South Yorkshire View on 19:16 - Jan 23 with 1732 views | Rozz |
Just says exactly what we already knew, doesn't it? Am I missing something? |  | | |
| The South Yorkshire View on 21:03 - Jan 23 with 1524 views | Swansea_Blue |
| The South Yorkshire View on 19:16 - Jan 23 by Rozz |
Just says exactly what we already knew, doesn't it? Am I missing something? |
Yep, that’s how I read it too. The headline is just a different take on exactly as reported by Phil on the day. |  |
| |
| The South Yorkshire View on 21:57 - Jan 23 with 1332 views | Illinoisblue |
| The South Yorkshire View on 21:03 - Jan 23 by Swansea_Blue |
Yep, that’s how I read it too. The headline is just a different take on exactly as reported by Phil on the day. |
Exactly. Although they’ve added a couple of digs: “big spending Ipswich” and “1million left back Davis”. As if Wednesday players are paid in magic beans. |  |
| |
| The South Yorkshire View on 03:37 - Jan 24 with 1014 views | Ryorry |
| The South Yorkshire View on 21:57 - Jan 23 by Illinoisblue |
Exactly. Although they’ve added a couple of digs: “big spending Ipswich” and “1million left back Davis”. As if Wednesday players are paid in magic beans. |
For an article that's supposed to have been written by a professional journalist, that's one of the worst, most amateurish pieces I've ever read.
They haven't even bothered to get it proof read (word left out in para 2, which completely alters the meaning) or adequately researched ("experienced" referee) - and that's before you even get to the childish bias. |  |
| |
| The South Yorkshire View on 04:41 - Jan 24 with 975 views | blueoxford |
| The South Yorkshire View on 03:37 - Jan 24 by Ryorry |
For an article that's supposed to have been written by a professional journalist, that's one of the worst, most amateurish pieces I've ever read.
They haven't even bothered to get it proof read (word left out in para 2, which completely alters the meaning) or adequately researched ("experienced" referee) - and that's before you even get to the childish bias. |
McKenna didn’t do a u-turn. He changed his decision based on what he was told by the ref |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
