| No offence to HALO but 21:03 - Aug 15 with 1769 views | Keno |
I love to be able to buy a plain shirt like this
|  |
| |  |
| No offence to HALO but on 21:13 - Aug 15 with 1605 views | Aero |
Totally agree. I have a few town shirts from through the years which are without sponsors. I picked them up used and assume they were previously worn by the youth teams. |  | | |
| I'm gonna be controversial here Kenny baby..... on 21:17 - Aug 15 with 1544 views | Bloots |
....but I think football shirts look crap without a sponsor.
Obviously they can still look crap with a sponsor, but generally they look better with one.
IMHO only obviously. |  |
| "Great to see you back on here mate, I was considering deactivating my account if you hadn’t returned" - TWTD User (Aug 2025) |
| |
| I'm gonna be controversial here Kenny baby..... on 21:30 - Aug 15 with 1407 views | Keno |
| I'm gonna be controversial here Kenny baby..... on 21:17 - Aug 15 by Bloots |
....but I think football shirts look crap without a sponsor.
Obviously they can still look crap with a sponsor, but generally they look better with one.
IMHO only obviously. |
Obviously Bloots on your hunky lithe rippling body any shirt looks good | |
| |
| No offence to HALO but on 21:30 - Aug 15 with 1404 views | lazyblue |
Bit dull really |  | | |
| No offence to HALO but on 22:45 - Aug 15 with 1098 views | football |
Look rubbish without a sponsor | | | |
| No offence to HALO but on 08:31 - Aug 16 with 636 views | Wickets |
I'm with you I would buy one of them. |  | | |
| I'm gonna be controversial here Kenny baby..... on 11:53 - Aug 16 with 426 views | stonojnr |
| I'm gonna be controversial here Kenny baby..... on 21:17 - Aug 15 by Bloots |
....but I think football shirts look crap without a sponsor.
Obviously they can still look crap with a sponsor, but generally they look better with one.
IMHO only obviously. |
most look crap with sponsors, because they just slap a logo on without any thought to how it fits with the design of the shirt.
and theyre usually the first bit that starts to wear off after a few washes.
they only smart one I saw recently was when Roma fell out with their sponsors and put SPQR on their shirts as they felt they needed something on the shirt,and that instantly became a fan favourite | | | |
| I'm gonna be controversial here Kenny baby..... on 12:22 - Aug 16 with 378 views | carlisleaway |
| I'm gonna be controversial here Kenny baby..... on 11:53 - Aug 16 by stonojnr |
most look crap with sponsors, because they just slap a logo on without any thought to how it fits with the design of the shirt.
and theyre usually the first bit that starts to wear off after a few washes.
they only smart one I saw recently was when Roma fell out with their sponsors and put SPQR on their shirts as they felt they needed something on the shirt,and that instantly became a fan favourite |
Nothing against HALO but think the MSC logo would have looked better on the shirt fronts |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| No offence to HALO but on 15:05 - Aug 16 with 229 views | EastLondonBlue |
From early reports the new shirts just need a couple of washes and the sponsor logo would be peeling off anyway so you may be in luck. |  | | |
| No offence to HALO but on 15:26 - Aug 16 with 182 views | SWLondonBlue93 |
Shirt design is done with the sponsor's logo in mind, so without it looks bland IMO. If there was no front-of-shirt sponsor, you would get a more interesting and/or elaborate design. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
